BACKGROUND: Although hip arthroplasty reliably relieves pain and improves function, problems have arisen with wear and osteolysis. Highly crosslinked polyethylene has been developed to address this problem although at present there is limited clinical evidence it does so longer term. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared the in vivo wear of standard versus highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLP) in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of 5-year followup. METHODS: We enrolled 122 patients in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial and followed them annually to assess their progress. Annual radiographs were analyzed using previously validated edge detection software to assess for two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and volumetric wear. The mean follow up was 5.5 years (range, 4.1 to 7 years). RESULTS: The two-dimensional wear measurements for HXLP showed lower wear compared to the conventional group (0.05 mm/year versus 0.26 mm/year, respectively). Three-dimensional and volumetric wear were similarly lower in the HXLP group. CONCLUSIONS:Highly crosslinked polyethylene undergoes substantially less wear than conventional polyethylene at medium term. The effect of hip arthroplasty longevity will need to be assessed with longer-term studies, but this may lead to a decreased need for revision as a result of less wear and osteolysis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although hip arthroplasty reliably relieves pain and improves function, problems have arisen with wear and osteolysis. Highly crosslinked polyethylene has been developed to address this problem although at present there is limited clinical evidence it does so longer term. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared the in vivo wear of standard versus highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLP) in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of 5-year followup. METHODS: We enrolled 122 patients in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial and followed them annually to assess their progress. Annual radiographs were analyzed using previously validated edge detection software to assess for two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and volumetric wear. The mean follow up was 5.5 years (range, 4.1 to 7 years). RESULTS: The two-dimensional wear measurements for HXLP showed lower wear compared to the conventional group (0.05 mm/year versus 0.26 mm/year, respectively). Three-dimensional and volumetric wear were similarly lower in the HXLP group. CONCLUSIONS: Highly crosslinked polyethylene undergoes substantially less wear than conventional polyethylene at medium term. The effect of hip arthroplasty longevity will need to be assessed with longer-term studies, but this may lead to a decreased need for revision as a result of less wear and osteolysis.
Authors: Andrew J Hui; Richard W McCalden; John M Martell; Steven J MacDonald; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: W J Maloney; J O Galante; M Anderson; V Goldberg; W H Harris; J Jacobs; M Kraay; P Lachiewicz; H E Rubash; S Schutzer; S T Woolson Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kenny Mai; Christopher Verioti; Kace A Ezzet; Steven N Copp; Richard H Walker; Clifford W Colwell Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Seppo Santavirta; Max Böhler; William H Harris; Yrjö T Konttinen; Reijo Lappalainen; Orhun Muratoglu; Claude Rieker; Martin Salzer Journal: Acta Orthop Scand Date: 2003-08
Authors: Aaron J Johnson; LaQuawn Loving; Lizeth Herrera; Ronald E Delanois; Aiguo Wang; Michael A Mont Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Robert S Namba; Rebecca Love; Steven M Kurtz Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Hugo C van der Veen; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Rudolf W Poolman; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raay Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Stuart A Callary; David G Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G Nilsson; John R Field Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Julio J Jauregui; Qais Naziri; Todd P Pierce; Randa K Elmallah; Jeffrey J Cherian; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.075