Literature DB >> 23229800

Is there evidence for accelerated polyethylene wear in uncemented compared to cemented acetabular components? A systematic review of the literature.

Hugo C van der Veen1, Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen, Rudolf W Poolman, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Jos J A M van Raay.   

Abstract

Joint arthroplasty registries show an increased rate of aseptic loosening in uncemented acetabular components as compared to cemented acetabular components. Since loosening is associated with particulate wear debris, we postulated that uncemented acetabular components demonstrate a higher polyethylene wear rate than cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. We performed a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, comparing the wear rate in uncemented and cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Studies were identified using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Study quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The search resulted in 425 papers. After excluding duplicates and selection based on title and abstracts, nine studies were found eligible for further analysis: two randomised controlled trials, and seven observational studies. One randomised controlled trial found a higher polyethylene wear rate in uncemented acetabular components, while the other found no differences. Three out of seven observational studies showed a higher polyethylene wear in uncemented acetabular component fixation; the other four studies did not show any differences in wear rates. The available evidence suggests that a higher annual wear rate may be encountered in uncemented acetabular components as compared to cemented components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23229800      PMCID: PMC3532628          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1738-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  39 in total

1.  Matched-pair analysis of cemented and cementless acetabular reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J C Clohisy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Premature wear and osteolysis in an HA-coated, uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Duffy; J L Sher; P F Partington
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

3.  A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  P McCombe; S A Williams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

4.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

Review 5.  The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement.

Authors:  Eileen Ingham; John Fisher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Radiographic measurement of wear in 5 cohorts of patients observed for 5 to 22 years.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; D R Pedersen; J P Olejniczak; D D Goetz; R C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component.

Authors:  J Livermore; D Ilstrup; B Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  In vivo polyethylene wear of bilateral total hip replacements - cemented versus uncemented modular sockets.

Authors:  Rebecca J Kampa; Andrew Hacker; Emmett Griffiths; John W Rosson
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement.

Authors:  John L Gaffey; John J Callaghan; Douglas R Pedersen; Devon D Goetz; Patrick M Sullivan; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Are cementless acetabular components the cause of excess wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  R S Nashed; D A Becker; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Experimental study of high-energy fractures delayed operation in promote bone healing.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Pan; Zhong Li; Jing Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Long-term survival of the uncemented Balgrist total hip replacement cup.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Jiri Lostak; Katerina Langova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Excessive polyethylene wear and acetabular bone defects from standard use of a hooded acetabular insert in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Davey M J M Gerhardt; Rick J M Sanders; Enrico de Visser; Job L C van Susante
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  To cement or not to cement acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and re-evaluation.

Authors:  Frank Van Praet; Michiel Mulier
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre; Loreto Barrios; Juan De la Torre-Mosquera; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega; Carlos González-Bravo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.