Yufei Yan1,2, Hao Chen1,2, Jianmin Feng2, Kaizhe Chen1,2, Kaidi Zhou1,2, Weixiang Hong1,2, Yi Wang2, Zhihong Liu1,2, Jiong Zhang2, Qingming Yang1,2, Lei Guo3,4, Chuan He5,6. 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China. 3. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Shanghai, China. guolei607@126.com. 4. Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, China. guolei607@126.com. 5. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Shanghai, China. drhechuan@sina.com. 6. Department of Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China. drhechuan@sina.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the long-term outcome and the wear characteristics of two distinct types of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical study on patients which were treated with total hip arthroplasty using either Enduron polyethylene (Enduron PE) or Trilogy polyethylene (Trilogy PE) liners based on a minimum of ten year follow up data. Morphological analyses of wear particles from tissue samples, which were harvested during revision surgeries, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 79 THAs in the Enduron group and 55 THAs in the Trilogy group were available for analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival with revision for wear-related complications as the endpoint of the Enduron PE liners was lower than that of Trilogy PE liners at ten years (93.5 % and 100 %, P = 0.03). The Enduron group had higher mean linear wear rate than that of the Trilogy group (0.20 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.03 mm/year, P < 0.01). The incidence of osteolysis for the Enduron group was higher than that of the Trilogy group (33.3 % and 12 %, P = 0.04). Under transmission electron microscopy, the Enduron group had more than 82 % of the particles less than 1.0 μm in size and more than 57 % of the particles less than 0.5 μm. CONCLUSION: The long-term performance of Enduron liners was worse than that of Trilogy liners. Further clinical follow-up may be necessary in patients with Enduron PE liners in order to avoid catastrophic complications.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the long-term outcome and the wear characteristics of two distinct types of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical study on patients which were treated with total hip arthroplasty using either Enduron polyethylene (Enduron PE) or Trilogy polyethylene (Trilogy PE) liners based on a minimum of ten year follow up data. Morphological analyses of wear particles from tissue samples, which were harvested during revision surgeries, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 79 THAs in the Enduron group and 55 THAs in the Trilogy group were available for analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival with revision for wear-related complications as the endpoint of the Enduron PE liners was lower than that of Trilogy PE liners at ten years (93.5 % and 100 %, P = 0.03). The Enduron group had higher mean linear wear rate than that of the Trilogy group (0.20 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.03 mm/year, P < 0.01). The incidence of osteolysis for the Enduron group was higher than that of the Trilogy group (33.3 % and 12 %, P = 0.04). Under transmission electron microscopy, the Enduron group had more than 82 % of the particles less than 1.0 μm in size and more than 57 % of the particles less than 0.5 μm. CONCLUSION: The long-term performance of Enduron liners was worse than that of Trilogy liners. Further clinical follow-up may be necessary in patients with Enduron PE liners in order to avoid catastrophic complications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Enduron polyethylene liner; Follow up; Total hip arthroplasty; Wear
Authors: Daniel M Estok; Charles R Bragdon; Gordon R Plank; Anna Huang; Orhun K Muratoglu; William H Harris Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: C Anderson Engh; Adam S Stepniewski; Stuart D Ginn; Sarah E Beykirch; Christi J Sychterz-Terefenko; Robert H Hopper; Charles A Engh Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: A Jedenmalm; S Affatato; P Taddei; W Leardini; U W Gedde; C Fagnano; M Viceconti Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Geraint E R Thomas; David J Simpson; Shahid Mehmood; Adrian Taylor; Peter McLardy-Smith; Harinderjit Singh Gill; David W Murray; Siôn Glyn-Jones Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert B Bourne; David G Chess; Kory D Charron Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Caroline Scemama; Philippe Anract; Valérie Dumaine; Antoine Babinet; Jean Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Harman Khatkar; Harry Hothi; Danielle de Villiers; Christian Lausmann; Daniel Kendoff; Thorsten Gehrke; John Skinner; Alister Hart Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 3.075