Literature DB >> 20417657

Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve.

Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz1, Russell L Woods, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

We are interested in clinical implications of adaptation to blurred and sharpened images. Therefore, we investigated repeatability, individual variability and characteristics of the adaptation curves of 39 normally-sighted individuals. The point of subjective neutrality (PSN - the slope of the spatial spectrum of the image that appears normal) following adaptation was measured for each adaptation level and was used to derive individual adaptation curves for each subject. Adaptation curves were fitted with a modified Tukey biweight function as the curves were found to be tumbled-S shaped and asymmetrical for blur and sharp in some subjects. The adaptation curve was found to be an individual characteristic as inter-subject variability exceeds test/re-test variability. The existence of individual variability may have implications for the prescription and clinical success of optical devices as well as image enhancement rehabilitation options. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20417657      PMCID: PMC2902630          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Blur adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  Sini George; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Blur adaptation in myopes.

Authors:  Mark Rosenfield; Susan E Hong; Sini George
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  A method for simulation of foveal vision during wear of corrective lenses.

Authors:  Richard Legras; Nicolas Chateau; W Neil Charman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity in myopes.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Balamurali Vasudevan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

7.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Decreased uncorrected vision after a period of distance fixation with spectacle wear.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; N A Brennan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Measuring perceived video quality of MPEG enhancement by people with impaired vision.

Authors:  Matthew Fullerton; Russell L Woods; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  13 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Individual and age-related variation in chromatic contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Effects of contour enhancement on low-vision preference and visual search.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo; P Matthew Bronstad; Zachary Reynolds; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Psychophysical contrast calibration.

Authors:  Long To; Russell L Woods; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Mark A Georgeson; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.