Literature DB >> 21047754

Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Lucie Sawides1, Susana Marcos, Sowmya Ravikumar, Larry Thibos, Arthur Bradley, Michael Webster.   

Abstract

Adapting to blurred or sharpened images alters the perceived focus of subsequently viewed images. We examined whether these adaptation effects could arise from actual sphero-cylindrical refractive errors, by testing aftereffects in images simulating second-order astigmatism. Image blur was varied from negative (vertical) through isotropic to positive (horizontal) astigmatism while maintaining constant blur strength. A 2AFC staircase was used to estimate the stimulus that appeared isotropically blurred before or after adapting to images with astigmatism. Adaptation to horizontal blur caused isotropically blurred images to appear vertically biased and vice versa, shifting the perceived isotropic point toward the adapting level. Aftereffects were similar for different types of images and showed partial selectivity so that strongest effects generally occurred when testing and adapting images were the same. Further experiments explored whether the adaptation depended more strongly on the blurring or "fuzziness" in the images vs. the apparent "figural" changes introduced by the blur, by comparing how the aftereffects transfer across changes in size or orientation. Our results suggest that strong selective adaptation can occur for different lower order aberrations of the eye and that these may be at least partly driven by the apparent figural changes that blurring introduces into the retinal image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047754      PMCID: PMC3244829          DOI: 10.1167/10.12.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  39 in total

1.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces.

Authors:  M A Webster; O H MacLin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision.

Authors:  W J Adams; M S Banks; R van Ee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xin Hong; Arthur Bradley; Xu Cheng
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Ocular wave-front aberration statistics in a normal young population.

Authors:  José Francisco Castejón-Mochón; Norberto López-Gil; Antonio Benito; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Hartmann-Shack technique and refraction across the horizontal visual field.

Authors:  David A Atchison; Dion H Scott; W Neil Charman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.

Authors:  S Marcos; S Barbero; L Llorente; J Merayo-Lloves
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect.

Authors:  L Zhao; C Chubb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Depth-dependent blur adaptation.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Robert A Jacobs; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  33 in total

1.  Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Barbara Dillenburger; Sabine Raphael; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Justin Wanek; J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Neural adaptation to peripheral blur in myopes and emmetropes.

Authors:  Atanu Ghosh; Len Zheleznyak; Antoine Barbot; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Mark A Georgeson; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.