Literature DB >> 8355963

Decreased uncorrected vision after a period of distance fixation with spectacle wear.

K Pesudovs1, N A Brennan.   

Abstract

Myopes of low degree commonly report that their vision seems poorer upon removal of their spectacles compared to that after a period without spectacle wear. Notably, this difference in vision can be appreciated after distance fixation. In this paper, we propose and test several alternative hypotheses to explain the phenomenon: an accommodative response to spectacles, sensory adaptation, or altered criteria for blur of psychological origin. We measured visual acuity (VA), refractive error, and lens thickness on 10 subjects with less than 2.00 D of myopia. Testing was performed after two 90-min sessions viewing at distance. At one session, the subjects wore their current spectacle correction and, at the other session, no correction was worn. VA underwent a slight but significant decrease (0.4 of a line) after the session in which spectacles were worn, but no difference in refractive error or lens thickness was found. The change in acuity in the absence of a refractive shift suggests sensory adaptation to blur. However, the demonstrated change in VA appears to be less than that which is subjectively reported; accordingly, psychological input cannot be ruled out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8355963     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199307000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  22 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian; N C Strang; P Kochhar; J P Wann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effects of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Justin Wanek; J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.