Literature DB >> 23850634

Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Khatuna Parkosadze1, Teona Kalmakhelidze, Marina Tolmacheva, Georgi Chichua, Archil Kezeli, Michael A Webster, John S Werner.   

Abstract

We explored the perception of image focus in patients with cataracts, and how this perception changed following cataract removal and implantation of an intraocular lens. Thirty-three patients with immature senile cataract and with normal retinal function were tested before surgery and 2 days after surgery, with 18 of the patients retested again at 2 months following surgery. The subjective focus of natural images was quantified in each session by varying the slope of the image amplitude spectra. At each time, short-term adaptation to the spectral slope was also determined by repeating the measurements after exposure to images with blurred or sharpened spectra. Despite pronounced acuity deficits, before surgery images appeared "best-focused" when they were only slightly blurred, consistent with a strong compensation for the acuity losses. Post-operatively, the image slopes that were judged "in focus" before surgery appeared too sharp. This bias remained strong at 2 months, and was independent of the rapid blur aftereffects induced by viewing filtered images. The focus settings tended to renormalize more rapidly in patients with higher post-operative acuity, while acuity differences were unrelated to the magnitude of the short-term blur aftereffects. Our results suggest that subjective judgments of image focus are largely compensated as cataracts develop, but potentially through a very long-term form of adaptation that results in persistent biases after the cataract is removed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blur adaptation; Cataract; Spatial vision

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850634      PMCID: PMC3909719          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  35 in total

Review 1.  Forever young: visual functions not affected or minimally affected by aging: a review.

Authors:  J M Enoch; J S Werner; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy; V Lakshminarayanan; M Rynders
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision.

Authors:  S J Galvin; R P O'Shea; A M Squire; D G Govan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Pupil size before and after phacoemulsification in nondiabetic and diabetic patients.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Discrimination of changes in the second-order statistics of natural and synthetic images.

Authors:  Y Tadmor; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian; N C Strang; P Kochhar; J P Wann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images.

Authors:  M A Webster; E Miyahara
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Decreased uncorrected vision after a period of distance fixation with spectacle wear.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; N A Brennan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Long-term renormalization of chromatic mechanisms following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Peter B Delahunt; Michael A Webster; Lei Ma; John S Werner
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Adaptation and perceptual norms in color vision.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Deanne Leonard
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  1 in total

1.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.