Literature DB >> 19017483

How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Jeremy B Wilmer1.   

Abstract

This paper is a call for greater use of individual differences in the basic science of visual perception. Individual differences yield insights into visual perception's functional organization, underlying biological/environmental mechanisms, and utility. I first explain the general approach advocated and where it comes from. Second, I describe five principles central to learning about the nature of visual perception through individual differences. Third, I elaborate on the use of individual differences to gain insights into the three areas mentioned above (function, biology/environment, utility), in each case describing the approach advocated, presenting model examples from the literature, and laying out illustrative research proposals for the case of stereopsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19017483      PMCID: PMC2586597          DOI: 10.1163/156856808786451408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  74 in total

1.  Extraction of depth from opposite-contrast stimuli: transient system can, sustained system can't.

Authors:  D R Pope; M Edwards; C S Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatial frequency tuned covariance channels for red-green and luminance-modulated gratings: psychophysical data from human adults.

Authors:  D H Peterzell; D Y Teller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Depth aliasing by the transient-stereopsis system.

Authors:  M Edwards; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Variations in normal color vision. IV. Binary hues and hue scaling.

Authors:  Gokhan Malkoc; Paul Kay; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Variance maps as a novel tool for localizing regions of interest in imaging studies of individual differences.

Authors:  Kazufumi Omura; Arthur Aron; Turhan Canli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect.

Authors:  Galit Yovel; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision.

Authors:  J Nathans; T P Piantanida; R L Eddy; T B Shows; D S Hogness
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Factors underlying individual differences in the color matches of normal observers.

Authors:  M A Webster; D I MacLeod
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions: the first four months of life in humans.

Authors:  D H Peterzell; J S Werner; P S Kaplan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  38 in total

1.  Do different 'magnocellular tasks' probe the same neural substrate?

Authors:  Patrick T Goodbourn; Jenny M Bosten; Ruth E Hogg; Gary Bargary; Adam J Lawrance-Owen; J D Mollon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate.

Authors:  Steven M Miller; Narelle K Hansell; Trung T Ngo; Guang B Liu; John D Pettigrew; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Color preference in red-green dichromats.

Authors:  Leticia Álvaro; Humberto Moreira; Julio Lillo; Anna Franklin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Different measures of holistic face processing tap into distinct but partially overlapping mechanisms.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Elizabeth A Nelson; Nicholas Watier; Denis Cousineau; Sébastien Béland; Charles A Collin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?

Authors:  John D Mollon; Jenny M Bosten; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.

Authors:  Christian Gerlach; Randi Starrfelt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

8.  Determinants of neural responses to disparity in natural scenes.

Authors:  Yiran Duan; Alexandra Yakovleva; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination.

Authors:  Melissa E Libertus; Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-23

10.  Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Melissa E Libertus; Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.