Literature DB >> 23643843

Psychophysical contrast calibration.

Long To1, Russell L Woods, Robert B Goldstein, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

Electronic displays and computer systems offer numerous advantages for clinical vision testing. Laboratory and clinical measurements of various functions and in particular of (letter) contrast sensitivity require accurately calibrated display contrast. In the laboratory this is achieved using expensive light meters. We developed and evaluated a novel method that uses only psychophysical responses of a person with normal vision to calibrate the luminance contrast of displays for experimental and clinical applications. Our method combines psychophysical techniques (1) for detection (and thus elimination or reduction) of display saturating non-linearities; (2) for luminance (gamma function) estimation and linearization without use of a photometer; and (3) to measure without a photometer the luminance ratios of the display's three color channels that are used in a bit-stealing procedure to expand the luminance resolution of the display. Using a photometer we verified that the calibration achieved with this procedure is accurate for both LCD and CRT displays enabling testing of letter contrast sensitivity to 0.5%. Our visual calibration procedure enables clinical, internet and home implementation and calibration verification of electronic contrast testing.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRT; Contrast; Display calibration; LCD; Linearization; Luminance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643843      PMCID: PMC3744609          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  22 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Stereoacuity at distance and near.

Authors:  Bonita P H Wong; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Zhong-Lin Lu; Pengjing Xu; Jianzhong Jin; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Contrast sensitivity norms for the Mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester.

Authors:  T R Corwin; N B Carlson; E Berger
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.

Authors:  Kavitha Thayaparan; Michael D Crossland; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays.

Authors:  D G Pelli; L Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Lutein improves visual function in some patients with retinal degeneration: a pilot study via the Internet.

Authors:  G Dagnelie; I S Zorge; T M McDonald
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2000-03

9.  BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.

Authors:  R P Rutstein; D A Corliss
Journal:  Binocul Vis Strabismus Q       Date:  2000

10.  Luminance contrast with clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Andrena Pierre; Walter Wittich; Jocelyn Faubert; Olga Overbury
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  10 in total

1.  How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Paolo Calcatelli; Eleonora Funaro; Marialuisa Martelli; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Positive and negative polarity contrast sensitivity measuring app.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Eli Peli
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2016-02-14

4.  The effect of central vision loss on perception of mutual gaze.

Authors:  Sarah Sheldon; Jessilin Quint; Heiko Hecht; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  BOLD signal change and contrast reversing frequency: an event-related fMRI study in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Pei Sun; Jianfei Guo; Shichun Guo; Jingyi Chen; Le He; Shimin Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter.

Authors:  Stylianos Tsapakis; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Andreas Diagourtas; Stylianos Kandarakis; Konstantinos Droutsas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Dimitrios Brouzas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-12

7.  Crowdsourcing visual perception experiments: a case of contrast threshold.

Authors:  Kyoshiro Sasaki; Yuki Yamada
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.

Authors:  Andy T Woods; Carlos Velasco; Carmel A Levitan; Xiaoang Wan; Charles Spence
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Todd Horowitz; P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detecting Visual Function Abnormality with a Contrast-Dependent Visual Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Li-Ting Tsai; Kuo-Meng Liao; Yuh Jang; Fu-Chang Hu; Wei-Chi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.