Literature DB >> 21307174

Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model.

Sarah L Elliott1, Mark A Georgeson, Michael A Webster.   

Abstract

Adapting to blurred or sharpened images alters perceived blur of a focused image (M. A. Webster, M. A. Georgeson, & S. M. Webster, 2002). We asked whether blur adaptation results in (a) renormalization of perceived focus or (b) a repulsion aftereffect. Images were checkerboards or 2-D Gaussian noise, whose amplitude spectra had (log-log) slopes from -2 (strongly blurred) to 0 (strongly sharpened). Observers adjusted the spectral slope of a comparison image to match different test slopes after adaptation to blurred or sharpened images. Results did not show repulsion effects but were consistent with some renormalization. Test blur levels at and near a blurred or sharpened adaptation level were matched by more focused slopes (closer to 1/f) but with little or no change in appearance after adaptation to focused (1/f) images. A model of contrast adaptation and blur coding by multiple-scale spatial filters predicts these blur aftereffects and those of Webster et al. (2002). A key proposal is that observers are pre-adapted to natural spectra, and blurred or sharpened spectra induce changes in the state of adaptation. The model illustrates how norms might be encoded and recalibrated in the visual system even when they are represented only implicitly by the distribution of responses across multiple channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21307174      PMCID: PMC3244882          DOI: 10.1167/11.2.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  46 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images.

Authors:  J R Müller; A B Metha; J Krauskopf; P Lennie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Wim A van de Grind; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Blur adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  Sini George; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual function before and after the removal of bilateral congenital cataracts in adulthood.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Harvey S Smallman; Peter Doyle; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The role of intervening patterns in the storage of the movement aftereffect.

Authors:  P Thompson; J Wright
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Spatial vision.

Authors:  R L De Valois; K K De Valois
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 24.137

View more
  20 in total

1.  Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual discomfort and flicker.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Jesel Garcia; Fang Jiang; Arnold J Wilkins; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Effects of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Justin Wanek; J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Sharpening vision by adapting to flicker.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Jeremy D Williams; Natasha E Phipps; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

9.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.