Literature DB >> 16697436

Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity in myopes.

Bin Wang1, Kenneth J Ciuffreda, Balamurali Vasudevan.   

Abstract

Although blur adaptation in myopia has been investigated, knowledge regarding its effect on blur sensitivity remains unknown. In the present study, changes in three blur thresholds (i.e., noticeable, bothersome, and non-resolvable blur) were assessed monocularly after 1h of blur adaptation in myopes. A Badal optical system was used to present either an isolated 20/50 Snellen E or 20/50 lines of text, with the full text field used in the latter condition for all blur judgments. Eight visually normal adult myopes were tested with paralyzed accommodation. All subjects exhibited blur adaptation, with a significant improvement in group mean visual acuity of -0.16 LogMAR. There was a consistent and concurrent significant decrease of 0.15-0.19 D in all blur thresholds for the isolated 20/50 E. However, there was no significant effect of blur adaptation on blur thresholds for the 20/50 text, with large intersubject variability evident. The enhanced blur sensitivity for the isolated E target may in part be attributed to the increased visual resolution following blur adaptation. Differences found in the blur thresholds for the two targets may be related to a variety of neuroperceptual phenomena, in particular lateral masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697436     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neural adaptation to peripheral blur in myopes and emmetropes.

Authors:  Atanu Ghosh; Len Zheleznyak; Antoine Barbot; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Factors Influencing Pseudo-Accommodation-The Difference between Subjectively Reported Range of Clear Focus and Objectively Measured Accommodation Range.

Authors:  Sandeep K Dhallu; Amy L Sheppard; Tom Drew; Toshifumi Mihashi; Juan F Zapata-Díaz; Hema Radhakrishnan; D Robert Iskander; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  The time course of the onset and recovery of axial length changes in response to imposed defocus.

Authors:  Samaneh Delshad; Michael J Collins; Scott A Read; Stephen J Vincent
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The effect of refractive surgery on blur thresholds.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Hadiya Farhath Pattan; Mehal Rathore; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Prema Padmanabhan; Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Blur Detection Sensitivity Increases in Children Using Orthokeratology.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Chunwen Tao; Xinjie Mao; Xin Lu; Jinhua Bao; Björn Drobe; Hao Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Effects of visual blur and contrast on spatial and temporal precision in manual interception.

Authors:  Anna Schroeger; J Walter Tolentino-Castro; Markus Raab; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effect of surrounding blur on foveal visibility.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sakai; Takayuki Kannon; Shiro Usui
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2007-11-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.