Literature DB >> 23568746

The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Pim van Dijk1, Geoffrey A Manley.   

Abstract

Small changes of air pressure outside the eardrum of five lizard species led to changes in frequency, level, and peak width of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). In contrast to humans, these changes generally occurred at very small pressures (<20 mbar). As in humans, SOAE amplitudes were generally reduced. Changes of SOAE frequency were both positive and negative, while in humans, they are mostly positive. In addition, in lizards, these effects often showed obvious hysteresis and non-repeatability. The correlation between peak width and height was negative in two species (comparable to humans) and positive in one species. In two other species, no correlation was found. Consequently, a simple oscillator model that explained the negative correlation in humans could not be generally applied to lizards. This presumably reflects the fact that in lizards, the spontaneous otoacoustic emission of sound from the ear consists of a combination of stable oscillations (as in humans), unstable narrow-band oscillations, and broad-band emissions, evident as "plateaus" in emission spectra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568746      PMCID: PMC3642271          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0385-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  26 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals.

Authors:  G A Manley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Are human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions generated by a chain of coupled nonlinear oscillators?

Authors:  Hero P Wit; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko.

Authors:  C E Stewart; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Auditory peripheral tuning: evidence for a simple resonance phenomenon in the lizard Tiliqua.

Authors:  G A Manley; G K Yates; C Köppl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Middle-ear function in the guinea pig.

Authors:  G A Manley; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Mechanical and acoustical influences on spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Schloth; E Zwicker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Basilar-membrane motion in the alligator lizard: its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity.

Authors:  W T Peake; A Ling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in monitor lizards.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 2.  Whistling While it Works: Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and the Cochlear Amplifier.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Bilateral Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Show Coupling between Active Oscillators in the Two Ears.

Authors:  Yuttana Roongthumskul; Dáibhid Ó Maoiléidigh; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.033

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.