Literature DB >> 27896486

Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Christopher G Clinard1, Sarah L Hodgson2, Mary Ellen Scherer2.   

Abstract

The binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is an auditory phenomenon where binaural tone-in-noise detection is improved when the phase of either signal or noise is inverted in one of the ears (SπNo or SoNπ, respectively), relative to detection when signal and noise are in identical phase at each ear (SoNo). Processing related to BMLDs and interaural time differences has been confirmed in the auditory brainstem of non-human mammals; in the human auditory brainstem, phase-locked neural responses elicited by BMLD stimuli have not been systematically examined across signal-to-noise ratio. Behavioral and physiological testing was performed in three binaural stimulus conditions: SoNo, SπNo, and SoNπ. BMLDs at 500 Hz were obtained from 14 young, normal-hearing adults (ages 21-26). Physiological BMLDs used the frequency-following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded auditory evoked potential dependent on sustained phase-locked neural activity; FFR tone-in-noise detection thresholds were used to calculate physiological BMLDs. FFR BMLDs were significantly smaller (poorer) than behavioral BMLDs, and FFR BMLDs did not reflect a physiological release from masking, on average. Raw FFR amplitude showed substantial reductions in the SπNo condition relative to SoNo and SoNπ conditions, consistent with negative effects of phase summation from left and right ear FFRs. FFR amplitude differences between stimulus conditions (e.g., SoNo amplitude-SπNo amplitude) were significantly predictive of behavioral SπNo BMLDs; individuals with larger amplitude differences had larger (better) behavioral B MLDs and individuals with smaller amplitude differences had smaller (poorer) behavioral B MLDs. These data indicate a role for sustained phase-locked neural activity in BMLDs of humans and are the first to show predictive relationships between behavioral BMLDs and human brainstem responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; binaural; binaural masking level difference; frequency-following response; neurophonic; phase locking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27896486      PMCID: PMC5352611          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0603-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  65 in total

1.  MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  M S John; T W Picton
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Effects of noise bandwidth on the late-potential masking level difference.

Authors:  C G Fowler; C M Mikami
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

3.  Binaural detection of 500-Hz tones in broadband and in narrowband masking noise: effects of signal/masker duration and forward masking fringes.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of masking noise.

Authors:  I J HIRSH
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1948-04

6.  Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds.

Authors:  Steven J Aiken; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Signal-to-noise ratio in the membrane potential of the owl's auditory coincidence detectors.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kazuo Funabiki; Paula T Kuokkanen; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Theoretical foundations of the sound analog membrane potential that underlies coincidence detection in the barn owl.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kazuo Funabiki; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  6 in total

1.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Gabriel S Sobczak; Colette M McKay; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Ambient noise exposure induces long-term adaptations in adult brainstem neurons.

Authors:  Ida Siveke; Mike H Myoga; Benedikt Grothe; Felix Felmy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.