Literature DB >> 21656197

Binaural unmasking of multi-channel stimuli in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Lieselot Van Deun1, Astrid van Wieringen, Tom Francart, Andreas Büchner, Thomas Lenarz, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

Previous work suggests that bilateral cochlear implant users are sensitive to interaural cues if experimental speech processors are used to preserve accurate interaural information in the electrical stimulation pattern. Binaural unmasking occurs in adults and children when an interaural delay is applied to the envelope of a high-rate pulse train. Nevertheless, for speech perception, binaural unmasking benefits have not been demonstrated consistently, even with coordinated stimulation at both ears. The present study aimed at bridging the gap between basic psychophysical performance on binaural signal detection tasks on the one hand and binaural perception of speech in noise on the other hand. Therefore, binaural signal detection was expanded to multi-channel stimulation and biologically relevant interaural delays. A harmonic complex, consisting of three sinusoids (125, 250, and 375 Hz), was added to three 125-Hz-wide noise bands centered on the sinusoids. When an interaural delay of 700 μs was introduced, an average BMLD of 3 dB was established. Outcomes are promising in view of real-life benefits. Future research should investigate the generalization of the observed benefits for signal detection to speech perception in everyday listening situations and determine the importance of coordination of bilateral speech processors and accentuation of envelope cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656197      PMCID: PMC3173550          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0275-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  31 in total

1.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The influence of signal duration, signal frequency and masker duration on binaural masking level differences.

Authors:  A Kohlrausch
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The binaural masking level difference as a function of frequency, masker level and masking bandwidth in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  J W Hall; A D Harvey
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1985
View more
  7 in total

1.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

2.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 5.  Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Karen Gordon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Perception of Interaural Phase Differences With Envelope and Fine Structure Coding Strategies in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stefan Zirn; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Auditory Attention and Spatial Unmasking in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Matthew J Goupell; Emily A Burg; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.