Literature DB >> 23363113

Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Payton Lin1, Thomas Lu, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

Across bilateral cochlear implants, contralateral threshold shift has been investigated as a function of electrode difference between the masking and probe electrodes. For contralateral electric masking, maximum threshold elevations occurred when the position of the masker and probe electrode was approximately place-matched across ears. The amount of masking diminished with increasing masker-probe electrode separation. Place-dependent masking occurred in both sequentially implanted ears, and was not affected by the masker intensity or the time delay from the masker onset. When compared to previous contralateral masking results in normal hearing, the similarities between place-dependent central masking patterns suggest comparable mechanisms of overlapping excitation in the central auditory nervous system.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363113      PMCID: PMC3574098          DOI: 10.1121/1.4773262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  49 in total

1.  Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40-Hz steady-state response.

Authors:  R Galambos; S Makeig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers.

Authors:  J H Mills; J R Dubno; N He
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination of symmetric time-intensity traded binaural stimuli.

Authors:  B R Ruotolo; R M Stern; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents.

Authors:  E H Warren; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.

Authors:  S Puria; J J Guinan; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient.

Authors:  M Pelizzone; A Kasper; P Montandon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  A L Giraud; L Collet; S Chéry-Croze; J Magnan; A Chays
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: a case study.

Authors:  B Scharf; J Magnan; L Collet; E Ulmer; A Chays
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea.

Authors:  H H Lim; Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lee; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Julia Stelmach; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Contralateral masking in bilateral cochlear implant patients: a model of medial olivocochlear function loss.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Monica Padilla; Qian-Jie Fu; David M Landsberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Contralateral efferent suppression of human hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15

5.  Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.

Authors:  François Guérit; Sébastien Santurette; Josef Chalupper; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Joshua S Stohl; Robert D Wolford; Reinhold Schatzer; Blake S Wilson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Katrin Krumbholz; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-22

8.  Correlation and Reliability of Behavioral and Otoacoustic-Emission Estimates of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Humans.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Auditory Attention and Spatial Unmasking in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Matthew J Goupell; Emily A Burg; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.