Literature DB >> 8807275

Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization.

R S Tyler1, A Q Summerfield.   

Abstract

This paper reviews research on cochlear implantation relevant to deprivation and acclimatization with acoustical hearing aids. The term "deprivation" is used in its everyday sense to refer to the bilateral absence of acoustic stimulation. Results are reviewed from several sources, with detailed evidence presented from three groups of postlingually deafened adult patients and one group of prelingually deafened child patients, all implanted at the University of Iowa. Outcomes from implantation reveal consistent effects of deprivation, evidenced by significant negative correlations between accuracy of speech perception and the duration of profound/total deafness before implantation. Outcomes also show acclimatization in the form of significant improvements in performance over time after implantation. For adult patients, the level of performance measured shortly after implantation on average is about half the level measured eventually. Individually, 80% of the adult patients implanted in Iowa show significant performance improvements with time. On average, performance reached asymptote after 30 to 40 mo of implant use, although individual differences in the rate and amount of improvement are large. Absolute accuracy of speech perception with implants by adults is believed to be related to preoperative measures in three domains: 1) the number and physiological responsiveness of auditory ganglion cells and nerve fibers, indexed by measures of hearing sensitivity, duration of deafness, and age; 2) the responsiveness of the central nervous system, indexed by measures of cognitive and linguistic ability, and possibly also by age and duration of deafness; and 3) the motivation to learn to use the implant. Preliminary analyses suggest that the measures in the first domain are more strongly associated with the immediate benefit from implantation than with the subsequent improvement in performance over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807275     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199617031-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 2.  Neurotrophic factors and neural prostheses: potential clinical applications based upon findings in the auditory system.

Authors:  Lisa N Pettingill; Rachael T Richardson; Andrew K Wise; Stephen J O'Leary; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Jacob Oleson; John F Knutson; Patrick Breheny; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski; John F Knutson; Christopher Turner; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2012

8.  Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Charles J Limb; Christa A Baker; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Andrea S Kelly
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

10.  Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; John F Knutson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.