Literature DB >> 9228813

Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

R J van Hoesel1, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Psychophysical studies have been completed with two binaural cochlear implant patients. In our earlier studies [van Hoesel et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 3187-3189 (1993); R. J. M. van Hoesel and G. M. Clark, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 106 104, 233-235 (1995)], lateralization experiments showed good sensitivity to interaural amplitudes but poor sensitivity to interaural time delays when compared with normal hearing subjects. In the studies presented here, both temporal and binaural intensity interactions were further explored. Interaural time delay (ITD) perception was investigated using direct measurement of the just-noticeable difference (jnd) in ITD. Both rate and place of stimulation were varied. Binaural rate discrimination was measured and compared with monaural rate perception. Binaural intensity interaction was explored for matched and unmatched place conditions by means of loudness summation and central masking studies. Results showed that ITDs for interaural time delays were large when compared to normal hearing, even when place of stimulation on each of the two sides was carefully matched. The jnds in ITD were similar for stimulation rates from 50 to 200 pps, and increased at 300 pps. Rate difference limens experiments showed similar results for diotic and monaural stimuli, but improved jnds for dichotic presentation at stimulation rates below 150-200 pps. Binaural intensity interactions showed loudness summation effects with both patients, for matched as well as unmatched place conditions. Central masking was also observed with both subjects, although it was not found to be place dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9228813     DOI: 10.1121/1.419611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  50 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal weighting of binaural cues revealed by detection of dynamic interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-17

6.  Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies.

Authors:  Deidra A Blanks; Jason M Roberts; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-07-27

7.  Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lee; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Aaron J Parkinson; Blake S Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.