Literature DB >> 20199927

Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model for PET image reconstruction.

Adam M Alessio1, Charles W Stearns, Shan Tong, Steven G Ross, Steve Kohlmyer, Alex Ganin, Paul E Kinahan.   

Abstract

Accurate system modeling in tomographic image reconstruction has been shown to reduce the spatial variance of resolution and improve quantitative accuracy. System modeling can be improved through analytic calculations, Monte Carlo simulations, and physical measurements. The purpose of this work is to improve clinical fully-3-D reconstruction without substantially increasing computation time. We present a practical method for measuring the detector blurring component of a whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) system to form an approximate system model for use with fully-3-D reconstruction. We employ Monte Carlo simulations to show that a non-collimated point source is acceptable for modeling the radial blurring present in a PET tomograph and we justify the use of a Na22 point source for collecting these measurements. We measure the system response on a whole-body scanner, simplify it to a 2-D function, and incorporate a parameterized version of this response into a modified fully-3-D OSEM algorithm. Empirical testing of the signal versus noise benefits reveal roughly a 15% improvement in spatial resolution and 10% improvement in contrast at matched image noise levels. Convergence analysis demonstrates improved resolution and contrast versus noise properties can be achieved with the proposed method with similar computation time as the conventional approach. Comparison of the measured spatially variant and invariant reconstruction revealed similar performance with conventional image metrics. Edge artifacts, which are a common artifact of resolution-modeled reconstruction methods, were less apparent in the spatially variant method than in the invariant method. With the proposed and other resolution-modeled reconstruction methods, edge artifacts need to be studied in more detail to determine the optimal tradeoff of resolution/contrast enhancement and edge fidelity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20199927      PMCID: PMC2903538          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2040188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  19 in total

1.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.

Authors:  Thomas Frese; Ned C Rouze; Charles A Bouman; Ken Sauer; Gary D Hutchins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Positron follow-up in liquid water: II. Spatial and energetic study for the most important radioisotopes used in PET.

Authors:  C Champion; C Le Loirec
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.

Authors:  C Ross Schmidtlein; Assen S Kirov; Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; John L Humm; Howard I Amols; Luc M Bidaut; Alex Ganin; Charles W Stearns; David L McDaniel; Klaus A Hamacher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Annihilation density distribution calculations for medically important positron emitters.

Authors:  M R Palmer; G L Brownell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Fast point spread function computation from aperture functions in high-resolution positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D Schmitt; B Karuta; C Carrier; R Lecomte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  APPLICATION OF A SPATIALLY VARIANT SYSTEM MODEL FOR 3-D WHOLE-BODY PET IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14

8.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy; S R Cherry; A Chatziioannou; T H Farquhar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution.

Authors:  C S Levin; E J Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  53 in total

1.  On the assessment of spatial resolution of PET systems with iterative image reconstruction.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Small-animal imaging using clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography and super-resolution.

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Sagar Patel; Kewal Asosingh; Serpil C Erzurum
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 4.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jinyi Qi; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  MRI-based nonrigid motion correction in simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Se Young Chun; Timothy G Reese; Jinsong Ouyang; Bastien Guerin; Ciprian Catana; Xuping Zhu; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Sinogram Blurring Matrix Estimation From Point Sources Measurements With Rank-One Approximation for Fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Jian Zhou; Michel Tohme; Martin Judenhofer; Yongfeng Yang; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Attenuation correction for brain PET imaging using deep neural network based on Dixon and ZTE MR images.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Jaewon Yang; Kyungsang Kim; Georges El Fakhri; Youngho Seo; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Hybrid Pixel-Waveform (HPWF) Enabled CdTe Detectors for Small Animal Gamma-Ray Imaging Applications.

Authors:  A Groll; K Kim; H Bhatia; J C Zhang; J H Wang; Z M Shen; L Cai; J Dutta; Q Li; L J Meng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01

9.  Efficient fully 3D list-mode TOF PET image reconstruction using a factorized system matrix with an image domain resolution model.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Applications of the line-of-response probability density function resolution model in PET list mode reconstruction.

Authors:  Y Jian; R Yao; T Mulnix; X Jin; R E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.