Literature DB >> 17975286

Positron follow-up in liquid water: II. Spatial and energetic study for the most important radioisotopes used in PET.

C Champion1, C Le Loirec.   

Abstract

With the increasing development of positron emission tomography (PET), beta(+)-emitters are more and more regularly used in nuclear medicine. Therefore, today it is of prime importance to have a reliable description of their behavior in living matter in order to quantify the full spectra of the molecular damages potentially radio-induced and then to access a cellular dosimetry. In this work, we present a detailed inter-comparison of the main isotopes commonly used in PET: (18)F, (11)C, (13)N, (15)O, (68)Ga and (82)Rb. We have used an event-by-event Monte Carlo code recently developed for positron tracking in water (Champion and Le Loirec 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1707-23) which consists in simulating step-by-step, interaction after interaction, the history of each ionizing particle created during the irradiation of the biological matter. This simulation has been finally adapted for describing the decays of medically important positron emitters. Quantitative information about positron penetrations, Positronium formation, annihilation event distributions, energy deposit patterns and dose profiles is then accessible and compared to published measurements and/or calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17975286     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/22/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  A positron-probe system for arterial input function quantification for positron emission tomography in humans.

Authors:  Kihak Lee; Peter T Fox; Jack L Lancaster; Paul A Jerabek
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Effect of the positron range of 18F, 68Ga and 124I on PET/CT in lung-equivalent materials.

Authors:  Gerrit J Kemerink; Mariëlle G W Visser; Renee Franssen; Emiel Beijer; Mariangela Zamburlini; Servé G E A Halders; Boudewijn Brans; Felix M Mottaghy; Gerrit J J Teule
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Joint correction of attenuation and scatter in image space using deep convolutional neural networks for dedicated brain 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Jaewon Yang; Dookun Park; Grant T Gullberg; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Is there still a role for SPECT-CT in oncology in the PET-CT era?

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks; Michael S Hofman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Spatially Variant Positron Range Modeling Derived from CT for PET Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam Alessio; Lawrence MacDonald
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2008

6.  Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model for PET image reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Charles W Stearns; Shan Tong; Steven G Ross; Steve Kohlmyer; Alex Ganin; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of [(18)F]2-(4-(4-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)phenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)-dione ([(18)F]FECUMI-101) as an imaging probe for 5-HT1A receptor agonist in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Vattoly J Majo; Matthew S Milak; Jaya Prabhakaran; Pratap Mali; Lyudmila Savenkova; Norman R Simpson; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey; J S Dileep Kumar
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Effects of magnetic fields of up to 9.4 T on resolution and contrast of PET images as measured with an MR-BrainPET.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Hans Herzog; Christoph Weirich; Lutz Tellmann; Joachim Kaffanke; Liliana Caldeira; Elena Rota Kops; Syed M Qaim; Heinz H Coenen; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Performance evaluation of Cerenkov luminescence imaging: a comparison of 68Ga with 18F.

Authors:  J Olde Heuvel; B J de Wit-van der Veen; K N Vyas; D S Tuch; M R Grootendorst; M P M Stokkel; C H Slump
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2019-10-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.