Literature DB >> 20167187

Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy.

Jessica R Castle1, W Kenneth Ward.   

Abstract

Amperometric glucose sensors have advanced the care of patients with diabetes and are being studied to control insulin delivery in the research setting. However, at times, currently available sensors demonstrate suboptimal accuracy, which can result from calibration error, sensor drift, or lag. Inaccuracy can be particularly problematic in a closed-loop glycemic control system. In such a system, the use of two sensors allows selection of the more accurate sensor as the input to the controller. In our studies in subjects with type 1 diabetes, the accuracy of the better of two sensors significantly exceeded the accuracy of a single, randomly selected sensor. If an array with three or more sensors were available, it would likely allow even better accuracy with the use of voting. 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167187      PMCID: PMC2825644          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

1.  Relationship between interstitial and blood glucose in type 1 diabetes patients: delay and the push-pull phenomenon revisited.

Authors:  Iris M E Wentholt; Augustus A M Hart; Joost B L Hoekstra; J Hans Devries
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Stacey Anderson; Lutz Heinemann; William Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Rise in background current over time in a subcutaneous glucose sensor in the rabbit: relevance to calibration and accuracy.

Authors:  W K Ward; M D Wood; J E Troupe
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  Statistics for critical clinical decision making based on readings of pairs of implanted sensors.

Authors:  D W Schmidtke; M V Pishko; C P Quinn; A Heller
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. II. Plasma-tissue exchange properties.

Authors:  A A Sharkawy; B Klitzman; G A Truskey; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

6.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times.

Authors:  A A Sharkawy; B Klitzman; G A Truskey; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

7.  A fully implantable subcutaneous glucose sensor array: enhanced accuracy from multiple sensing units and a median-based algorithm.

Authors:  W Kenneth Ward; Heather M Casey; Matthew J Quinn; Isaac F Federiuk; Michael D Wood
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; James Smith; Christie Beatson; Benita Lopez-Baca; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Improved glucose excursions using an implantable real-time continuous glucose sensor in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Sherwyn Schwartz; Steven V Edelman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Extensive Assessment of Blood Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Period and Its Impact on Closed-Loop Performance.

Authors:  Lyvia Biagi; Arthur Hirata Bertachi; Ignacio Conget; Carmen Quirós; Marga Giménez; F Javier Ampudia-Blasco; Paolo Rossetti; Jorge Bondia; Josep Vehí
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-21

Review 3.  Moving Toward a Unified Platform for Insulin Delivery and Sensing of Inputs Relevant to an Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  Anneke Graf; Sybil A McAuley; Catriona Sims; Johanna Ulloa; Alicia J Jenkins; Gayane Voskanyan; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-13

Review 4.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 5.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and foreign body response-part II: examples and application.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 6.  Clinical Implications of Accuracy Measurements of Continuous Glucose Sensors.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Manuela Link; Ulrike Kamecke; Cornelia Haug; Bernhard Baumgartner; Raimund Weitgasser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-07

8.  Advances in Subcutaneous Glucose Sensing.

Authors:  Jessica R Castle
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 9.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amin Sharifi; Andrea Varsavsky; Johanna Ulloa; Jodie C Horsburgh; Sybil A McAuley; Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy; Alicia J Jenkins; Peter G Colman; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Rajiv Shah; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.