Literature DB >> 21722579

Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and foreign body response-part II: examples and application.

Kristen L Helton1, Buddy D Ratner, Natalie A Wisniewski.   

Abstract

This article is the second part of a two-part review in which we explore the biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface as an important aspect of continuous glucose sensor biocompatibility. Part I, featured in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, describes a theoretical framework of how biomechanical factors such as motion and pressure (typically micromotion and micropressure) affect tissue physiology around a sensor and in turn, impact sensor performance. Here in Part II, a literature review is presented that summarizes examples of motion or pressure affecting sensor performance. Data are presented that show how both acute and chronic forces can impact continuous glucose monitor signals. Also presented are potential strategies for countering the ill effects of motion and pressure on glucose sensors. Improved engineering and optimized chemical biocompatibility have advanced sensor design and function, but we believe that mechanical biocompatibility, a rarely considered factor, must also be optimized in order to achieve an accurate, long-term, implantable sensor.
© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21722579      PMCID: PMC3192630          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  55 in total

1.  Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast.

Authors:  Elijah E W Van Houten; Marvin M Doyley; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Assessment of elastic parameters of human skin using dynamic elastography.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thérèse Baldeweck; Mickaël Tanter; Stefan Catheline; Mathias Fink; Laurent Sandrin; Céline Cornillon; Bernard Querleux
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Strategies for testing long-term transcutaneous amperometric glucose sensors.

Authors:  Nathan Long; Bazhang Yu; Yvonne Moussy; Francis Moussy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  An innovative application of a small-scale motion analysis technique to quantify human skin deformation in vivo.

Authors:  Jamaluddin Mahmud; Cathy A Holt; Sam L Evans
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; S Goodman; S Toksvig-Larsen; L Ryd; T Albrektsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-04

6.  Does subcutaneous adipose tissue behave as an (anti-)thixotropic material?

Authors:  Marion Geerligs; Gerrit W M Peters; Paul A J Ackermans; Cees W J Oomens; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Mechanical properties of human stratum corneum: effects of temperature, hydration, and chemical treatment.

Authors:  Kenneth S Wu; William W van Osdol; Reinhold H Dauskardt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses.

Authors:  S Weinbaum; S C Cowin; Y Zeng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo.

Authors:  P G Agache; C Monneur; J L Leveque; J De Rigal
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  Modeling the relative impact of capsular tissue effects on implanted glucose sensor time lag and signal attenuation.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; Fan Yuan; William M Reichert
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  44 in total

1.  Comparison of Insulins Glargine and Degludec in Diabetic Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) with CGM Devices.

Authors:  Samantha C Puglisi; Alexis L Mackiewicz; Amir Ardeshir; Laura M Garzel; Kari L Christe
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 2.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  A novel method to detect pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISA) in an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Nihat Baysal; Fraser Cameron; Bruce A Buckingham; Darrell M Wilson; H Peter Chase; David M Maahs; B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-14

4.  Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Michael Schoemaker; Günther Schmelzeisen-Redecker; Rolf Hinzmann; Adham Kassab; Guido Freckmann; Florian Reiterer; Luigi Del Re
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-19

5.  Analysis of the Accuracy and Performance of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Prototype: An In-Silico Study Using the UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Rolf Hinzmann; Enrique Campos-Nañez; Susan Riddle; Michael Schoemaker; Guenther Schmelzeisen-Redeker
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-13

Review 6.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Interstitial fluid physiology as it relates to glucose monitoring technologies: symposium introduction.

Authors:  Natalie A Wisniewski; Uli Klueh; Julie Stenken
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

8.  A miniaturized transcutaneous system for continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Robert A Croce; SanthiSagar Vaddiraju; Jun Kondo; Yan Wang; Liang Zuo; Kai Zhu; Syed K Islam; Diane J Burgess; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Faquir C Jain
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 9.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amin Sharifi; Andrea Varsavsky; Johanna Ulloa; Jodie C Horsburgh; Sybil A McAuley; Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy; Alicia J Jenkins; Peter G Colman; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Rajiv Shah; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.