Literature DB >> 9599036

Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times.

A A Sharkawy1, B Klitzman, G A Truskey, W M Reichert.   

Abstract

The results of two previous studies have shown that implant porosity can be used to increase both the measured diffusion coefficients and the vascularity within the tissue encapsulating long-term subcutaneous implants. This study investigates the hypothesis that the analyte concentrations within the tissue surrounding porous implants will respond more quickly to changes in plasma levels than does the densely packed, avascular fibrous capsule surrounding nonporous implants. The average concentration of lissamine-rhodamine was measured in tissue within 100 microm of the following implants at four different times following injection of the tracer: PVA-skin, PVA-5, PVA-60, PVA-700 (polyvinyl alcohol nonporous, 5 microm, 60 microm, and 700 microm mean pore sizes, respectively) and PTFE-0.5 and PTFE-5 (polytetrafluoroethylene 0.5 microm and 5 microm mean pore sizes, respectively). The results were compared to those of unimplanted subcutaneous tissue (SQ). In addition, the data were analyzed with a simple two-compartment model in which a tissue response time constant (taup) was extracted. As in the case of vascular density, the cellular dimension of the PVA-60 pore sizes produced surrounding tissue with the optimum response times to changes in plasma concentrations. The concentrations of rhodamine within the tissue surrounding the PVA-60 implant were the highest at all time points and responded to the change in plasma rhodamine concentration approximately three times more quickly (taup = 764 s) than the fibrous tissue encapsulating the nonporous PVA-skin (taup = 2058 s) and more than twice as quickly as SQ (taup = 1627 s). The overall mass transfer rate between plasma and the tissue surrounding the different implants calculated from the permeability and density of vessels from the previous study correlated very well (r2 = 0.7, p < .02, slope of 0.98) with the reciprocal of the tissue response time constant (taup).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9599036     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<598::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  31 in total

Review 1.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Bioluminescence imaging of glucose in tissue surrounding polyurethane and glucose sensor implants.

Authors:  Heather L Prichard; Thies Schroeder; William M Reichert; Bruce Klitzman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 3.  In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations.

Authors:  Heidi E Koschwanez; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Induction of angiogenesis in tissue-engineered scaffolds designed for bone repair: a combined gene therapy-cell transplantation approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Jabbarzadeh; Trevor Starnes; Yusuf M Khan; Tao Jiang; Anthony J Wirtel; Meng Deng; Qing Lv; Lakshmi S Nair; Steven B Doty; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy.

Authors:  Jessica R Castle; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 6.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

7.  A review of the management of implanted medical devices for diabetes: trends and directions.

Authors:  Carl Edman; Darrel Drinan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 8.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Polyelectrolyte-coated alginate microspheres as drug delivery carriers for dexamethasone release.

Authors:  R D Jayant; M J McShane; R Srivastava
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.419

10.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of porous poly-L-lactic acid coatings for subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors.

Authors:  H E Koschwanez; F Y Yap; B Klitzman; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.