Literature DB >> 19243265

Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Satish K Garg1, James Smith, Christie Beatson, Benita Lopez-Baca, Mary Voelmle, Peter A Gottlieb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the accuracy and safety of two continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, the SEVEN (DexCom, San Diego, CA) and the Navigator (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA), with the YSI laboratory measurements of blood glucose (blood glucose meter manufactured by YSI, Yellow Springs, OH), when worn concurrently in adults with type 1 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen subjects with type 1 diabetes, 33 +/- 6 (mean +/- SD) years old, were enrolled in this study. All subjects wore both sensors concurrently over three consecutive 5-day CGM sessions (15-day wear). On Days 5, 10, and 15, subjects participated in an 8-h in-clinic session where measurements from the CGM systems were collected and compared with YSI measurements every 15 min. At the end of Day 5 and 10 in-clinic sessions, the sensors were removed, and new sensors were inserted for the following CGM session despite the SEVEN system's recommended use for up to 7 days.
RESULTS: The mean absolute relative difference (ARD) for the two CGM devices versus YSI was not different: 16.8% and 16.1% for SEVEN and Navigator, respectively (P = 0.38). In the hypoglycemic region (YSI value <80 mg/dL), the mean ARD for SEVEN was lower than for Navigator (21.5% vs. 29.8%, respectively; P = 0.001). The data analyses were similar when compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values. Thirteen additional Navigator replacement devices were issued compared to two for the SEVEN. A total of three versus 14 skin reactions were reported with the SEVEN and Navigator insertion area, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Glucose measurements with the SEVEN and Navigator were found to be similar compared with YSI and SMBG measurements, with the exception of the hypoglycemic range where the SEVEN performed better. However, the Navigator caused more skin area reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19243265     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  40 in total

1.  Real-time glucose estimation algorithm for continuous glucose monitoring using autoregressive models.

Authors:  Yenny Leal; Winston Garcia-Gabin; Jorge Bondia; Eduardo Esteve; Wifredo Ricart; Jose-Manuel Fernández-Real; Josep Vehí
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  Effect of short-term use of a continuous glucose monitoring system with a real-time glucose display and a low glucose alarm on incidence and duration of hypoglycemia in a home setting in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Raymond J Davey; Timothy W Jones; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.

Authors:  Harald Kirchsteiger; Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann; Volker Lodwig; Günther Schmelzeisen-Redeker; Michael Schoemaker; Luigi Del Re
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 4.  Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy.

Authors:  Jessica R Castle; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

5.  Performance evaluation of three continuous glucose monitoring systems: comparison of six sensors per subject in parallel.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Eva Zschornack; Hans-Martin Klötzer; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

6.  Evaluation of a novel continuous glucose measurement device in patients with diabetes mellitus across the glycemic range.

Authors:  Linda Morrow; Marcus Hompesch; Ann M Tideman; Jennifer Matson; Nancy Dunne; Scott Pardo; Joan L Parkes; Holly C Schachner; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

7.  Accuracy performance of the Medtronic NexSensor™ for 6 days in an inpatient setting using abdomen and buttocks insertion sites.

Authors:  Tim Peoples; Timothy Bailey; Brazg Ronald; Howard C Zisser; Bob Janowski; Suiying Huang; Cary Talbot; Qingqing Yang
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-01

8.  Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Rijkenberg; S C van Steen; J H DeVries; P H J van der Voort
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Implantable nanosensors: toward continuous physiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Timothy T Ruckh; Heather A Clark
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Evaluating the accuracy and large inaccuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Marianna Nodale; Janet M Allen; Daniela Elleri; Kavita Kumareswaran; Ahmad Haidar; Karen Caldwell; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Carlo L Acerini; Mark L Evans; Helen R Murphy; David B Dunger; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.