Literature DB >> 21722578

Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Kristen L Helton1, Buddy D Ratner, Natalie A Wisniewski.   

Abstract

The importance of biomechanics in glucose sensor function has been largely overlooked. This article is the first part of a two-part review in which we look beyond commonly recognized chemical biocompatibility to explore the biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface as an important aspect of continuous glucose sensor biocompatibility. Part I provides a theoretical framework to describe how biomechanical factors such as motion and pressure (typically micromotion and micropressure) give rise to interfacial stresses, which affect tissue physiology around a sensor and, in turn, impact sensor performance. Three main contributors to sensor motion and pressure are explored: applied forces, sensor design, and subject/patient considerations. We describe how acute forces can temporarily impact sensor signal and how chronic forces can alter the foreign body response and inflammation around an implanted sensor, and thus impact sensor performance. The importance of sensor design (e.g., size, shape, modulus, texture) and specific implant location on the tissue response are also explored. In Part II: Examples and Application (a sister publication), examples from the literature are reviewed, and the application of biomechanical concepts to sensor design are described. We believe that adding biomechanical strategies to the arsenal of material compositions, surface modifications, drug elution, and other chemical strategies will lead to improvements in sensor biocompatibility and performance.
© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21722578      PMCID: PMC3192629          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  138 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling.

Authors:  N Wisniewski; F Moussy; W M Reichert
Journal:  Fresenius J Anal Chem       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

2.  Understanding spontaneous output fluctuations of an amperometric glucose sensor: effect of inhalation anesthesia and use of a nonenzyme containing electrode.

Authors:  W K Ward; M D Wood; J E Troupe
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Quantifying the composition of human skin for glucose sensor development.

Authors:  Willemijn Groenendaal; Golo von Basum; Kristiane A Schmidt; Peter A J Hilbers; Natal A W van Riel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 4.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A fluorescence-based glucose biosensor using concanavalin A and dextran encapsulated in a poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel.

Authors:  R J Russell; M V Pishko; C C Gefrides; M J McShane; G L Coté
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times.

Authors:  A A Sharkawy; B Klitzman; G A Truskey; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

7.  Mechanical properties of human stratum corneum: effects of temperature, hydration, and chemical treatment.

Authors:  Kenneth S Wu; William W van Osdol; Reinhold H Dauskardt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Modeling the relative impact of capsular tissue effects on implanted glucose sensor time lag and signal attenuation.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; Fan Yuan; William M Reichert
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Pathophysiology of skin flaps raised on expanded pig skin.

Authors:  G H Sasaki; C Y Pang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Vascularizing the tissue surrounding a model biosensor: how localized is the effect of a subcutaneous infusion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)?

Authors:  W Kenneth Ward; Matthew J Quinn; Michael D Wood; Kenneth L Tiekotter; Sudha Pidikiti; Jennifer A Gallagher
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 10.618

View more
  41 in total

1.  Hybrid online sensor error detection and functional redundancy for systems with time-varying parameters.

Authors:  Jianyuan Feng; Kamuran Turksoy; Sediqeh Samadi; Iman Hajizadeh; Elizabeth Littlejohn; Ali Cinar
Journal:  J Process Control       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.666

Review 2.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and foreign body response-part II: examples and application.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  A novel method to detect pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISA) in an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Nihat Baysal; Fraser Cameron; Bruce A Buckingham; Darrell M Wilson; H Peter Chase; David M Maahs; B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-14

Review 4.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Glucose Sensing in the Subcutaneous Tissue: Attempting to Correlate the Immune Response with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph; Gabriella Eisler; David Diaz; Abdurizzagh Khalf; Channy Loeum; Marc C Torjman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection.

Authors:  Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-17

7.  Interstitial fluid physiology as it relates to glucose monitoring technologies: symposium introduction.

Authors:  Natalie A Wisniewski; Uli Klueh; Julie Stenken
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

8.  Inflammation via myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 signaling mediates the fibrotic response to implantable synthetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.

Authors:  Luke D Amer; Leila S Saleh; Cierra Walker; Stacey Thomas; William J Janssen; Scott Alper; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amin Sharifi; Andrea Varsavsky; Johanna Ulloa; Jodie C Horsburgh; Sybil A McAuley; Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy; Alicia J Jenkins; Peter G Colman; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Rajiv Shah; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.