Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Clinical Implications of Accuracy Measurements of Continuous Glucose Sensors.

Literature DB >> 28541134

Clinical Implications of Accuracy Measurements of Continuous Glucose Sensors.

Abstract

The accuracy of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) now supports its use by persons with diabetes and clinicians caring for them. This article reviews measures of CGM accuracy, factors contributing to accuracy, comparative accuracy assessment, clinical implications of CGM sensor accuracy, and recent clinical trials that have demonstrated the utility of CGMs.

Entities: Chemical Disease Species

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Continuous home monitoring; Self-monitoring of blood glucose; Sensors

Mesh：

Substances：
Blood Glucose

Year: 2017 PMID： 28541134 PMCID： PMC5444490 DOI： 10.1089/dia.2017.0050

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther ISSN： 1520-9156 Impact factor: 6.118

35 in total

1. Limitations of statistical measures of error in assessing the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors.

Authors: Craig Kollman; Darrell M Wilson; Tim Wysocki; William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck
Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 6.118

2. The need for performance standards for continuous glucose monitors.

Authors: James H Nichols; David C Klonoff
Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2007-01

3. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors: W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1987 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 19.112

4. Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:
Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1987 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 19.112

5. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors: Roy W Beck; Tonya Riddlesworth; Katrina Ruedy; Andrew Ahmann; Richard Bergenstal; Stacie Haller; Craig Kollman; Davida Kruger; Janet B McGill; William Polonsky; Elena Toschi; Howard Wolpert; David Price
Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 56.272

6. A new-generation continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system.

Authors: Mark Christiansen; Timothy Bailey; Elaine Watkins; David Liljenquist; David Price; Katherine Nakamura; Robert Boock; Thomas Peyser
Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 6.118

7. Modeling of Calibration Effectiveness and Blood-to-Interstitial Glucose Dynamics as Potential Confounders of the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Sensors during Hyperinsulinemic Clamp.

Authors: Christopher King; Stacey M Anderson; Marc Breton; William L Clarke; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2007-05

8. From Two to One Per Day Calibration of Dexcom G4 Platinum by a Time-Varying Day-Specific Bayesian Prior.

Authors: Giada Acciaroli; Martina Vettoretti; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino; Claudio Cobelli
Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 6.118

9. Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia.

Authors: Richard M Bergenstal; David C Klonoff; Satish K Garg; Bruce W Bode; Melissa Meredith; Robert H Slover; Andrew J Ahmann; John B Welsh; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245

10. Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions.

Authors: J Kropff; D Bruttomesso; W Doll; A Farret; S Galasso; Y M Luijf; J K Mader; J Place; F Boscari; T R Pieber; E Renard; J H DeVries
Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 6.577

17 in total

1. Flash Glucose Monitoring: The Future Is Here.

Authors: Satish K Garg; Halis Kaan Akturk
Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2. Artificial Pancreas: Current Progress and Future Outlook in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors: Rozana Ramli; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver
Journal: Drugs Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 9.546

3. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications.

Authors: Martina Vettoretti; Giacomo Cappon; Giada Acciaroli; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2018-05-22

4. Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors: Dessi P Zaharieva; Kamuran Turksoy; Sarah M McGaugh; Rubin Pooni; Todd Vienneau; Trang Ly; Michael C Riddell
Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5. Measures of Accuracy for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.

Authors: Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Mike Grady; Steven Setford; Brian Levy
Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2018-11-19

6. Non-invasive and minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of hypoglycaemia detection.

Authors: Nicole Lindner; Aya Kuwabara; Tim Holt
Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-05-10

7. A prolonged run-in period of standard subcutaneous microdialysis ameliorates quality of interstitial glucose signal in patients after major cardiac surgery.

Authors: Othmar Moser; Julia Münzker; Stefan Korsatko; Christoph Pachler; Karlheinz Smolle; Wolfgang Toller; Thomas Augustin; Johannes Plank; Thomas R Pieber; Julia K Mader; Martin Ellmerer
Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.379