Literature DB >> 20150683

Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.

S Tong1, A M Alessio, P E Kinahan.   

Abstract

The addition of accurate system modeling in PET image reconstruction results in images with distinct noise texture and characteristics. In particular, the incorporation of point spread functions (PSF) into the system model has been shown to visually reduce image noise, but the noise properties have not been thoroughly studied. This work offers a systematic evaluation of noise and signal properties in different combinations of reconstruction methods and parameters. We evaluate two fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms: (1) OSEM with exact scanner line of response modeled (OSEM+LOR), (2) OSEM with line of response and a measured point spread function incorporated (OSEM+LOR+PSF), in combination with the effects of four post-reconstruction filtering parameters and 1-10 iterations, representing a range of clinically acceptable settings. We used a modified NEMA image quality (IQ) phantom, which was filled with 68Ge and consisted of six hot spheres of different sizes with a target/background ratio of 4:1. The phantom was scanned 50 times in 3D mode on a clinical system to provide independent noise realizations. Data were reconstructed with OSEM+LOR and OSEM+LOR+PSF using different reconstruction parameters, and our implementations of the algorithms match the vendor's product algorithms. With access to multiple realizations, background noise characteristics were quantified with four metrics. Image roughness and the standard deviation image measured the pixel-to-pixel variation; background variability and ensemble noise quantified the region-to-region variation. Image roughness is the image noise perceived when viewing an individual image. At matched iterations, the addition of PSF leads to images with less noise defined as image roughness (reduced by 35% for unfiltered data) and as the standard deviation image, while it has no effect on background variability or ensemble noise. In terms of signal to noise performance, PSF-based reconstruction has a 7% improvement in contrast recovery at matched ensemble noise levels and 20% improvement of quantitation SNR in unfiltered data. In addition, the relations between different metrics are studied. A linear correlation is observed between background variability and ensemble noise for all different combinations of reconstruction methods and parameters, suggesting that background variability is a reasonable surrogate for ensemble noise when multiple realizations of scans are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20150683      PMCID: PMC2890317          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Noise characterization of block-iterative reconstruction algorithms: I. Theory.

Authors:  E J Soares; C L Byrne; S J Glick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Noise characterization of block-iterative reconstruction algorithms: II. Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Edward J Soares; Stephen J Glick; John W Hoppin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.

Authors:  H H Barrett; D W Wilson; B M Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Noise analysis of MAP-EM algorithms for emission tomography.

Authors:  W Wang; G Gindi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy; S R Cherry; A Chatziioannou; T H Farquhar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Rotate-and-slant projector for fast LOR-based fully-3-D iterative PET reconstruction.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Noel F Black; James J Hamill; Vladimir Y Panin; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  44 in total

1.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.

Authors:  R K Doot; J S Scheuermann; P E Christian; J S Karp; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effects of point spread function-based image reconstruction on neuroreceptor binding in positron emission tomography study with [(11)C]FLB 457.

Authors:  Thonnapong Thongpraparn; Yoko Ikoma; Takahiro Shiraishi; Taiga Yamaya; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-12-16

3.  A novel approach to assess the treatment response using Gaussian random field in PET.

Authors:  Mengdie Wang; Ning Guo; Guangshu Hu; Georges El Fakhri; Hui Zhang; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jinyi Qi; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Performance Evaluation of Small Animal PET Scanners With Different System Designs.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Adam M Alessio; Thompson H Burnett; Thomas K Lewellen; Roberts Miyaoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.679

Review 7.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Arman Rahmim; Pardis Ghaffarian; Parham Geramifar; Hamid Abdollahi; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Evaluation of lesion detectability in positron emission tomography when using a convergent penalized likelihood image reconstruction method.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Sangtae Ahn; Scott Wollenweber; Steven G Ross; Paul E Kinahan; Ravindra M Manjeshwar
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-22

10.  The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients.

Authors:  Paul K R Dasari; Judson P Jones; Michael E Casey; Yuanyuan Liang; Vasken Dilsizian; Mark F Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.