Literature DB >> 28567548

The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.

Isaac Shiri1, Arman Rahmim2,3, Pardis Ghaffarian4,5, Parham Geramifar6, Hamid Abdollahi7, Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the robustness of different PET/CT image radiomic features over a wide range of different reconstruction settings.
METHODS: Phantom and patient studies were conducted, including two PET/CT scanners. Different reconstruction algorithms and parameters including number of sub-iterations, number of subsets, full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Gaussian filter, scan time per bed position and matrix size were studied. Lesions were delineated and one hundred radiomic features were extracted. All radiomics features were categorized based on coefficient of variation (COV).
RESULTS: Forty seven percent features showed COV ≤ 5% and 10% of which showed COV > 20%. All geometry based, 44% and 41% of intensity based and texture based features were found as robust respectively. In regard to matrix size, 56% and 6% of all features were found non-robust (COV > 20%) and robust (COV ≤ 5%) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Variability and robustness of PET/CT image radiomics in advanced reconstruction settings is feature-dependent, and different settings have different effects on different features. Radiomic features with low COV can be considered as good candidates for reproducible tumour quantification in multi-center studies. KEY POINTS: • PET/CT image radiomics is a quantitative approach assessing different aspects of tumour uptake. • Radiomic features robustness is an important issue over different image reconstruction settings. • Variability and robustness of PET/CT image radiomics in advanced reconstruction settings is feature-dependent. • Robust radiomic features can be considered as good candidates for tumour quantification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; Quantification; Radiomics; Reconstruction settings; Robustness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28567548     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4859-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  38 in total

1.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

Authors:  S C Huang
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Jianhua Yan; Jason Lim Chu-Shern; Hoi Yin Loi; Lih Kin Khor; Arvind K Sinha; Swee Tian Quek; Ivan W K Tham; David Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters.

Authors:  Paulina E Galavis; Christian Hollensen; Ngoneh Jallow; Bhudatt Paliwal; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 4.  Update on time-of-flight PET imaging.

Authors:  Suleman Surti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Mathieu Hatt; Nidal Albarghach; Olivier Pradier; Jean-Philippe Metges; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Mohamed Majdoub; Martin Vallières; Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; David Groheux; Elif Hindié; Antoine Martineau; Olivier Pradier; Roland Hustinx; Remy Perdrisot; Remy Guillevin; Issam El Naqa; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Variability of Image Features Computed from Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jasmine A Oliver; Mikalai Budzevich; Geoffrey G Zhang; Thomas J Dilling; Kujtim Latifi; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.

Authors:  Ralph T H Leijenaar; Georgi Nalbantov; Sara Carvalho; Wouter J C van Elmpt; Esther G C Troost; Ronald Boellaard; Hugo J W L Aerts; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Revisiting the Robustness of PET-Based Textural Features in the Context of Multi-Centric Trials.

Authors:  Clément Bailly; Caroline Bodet-Milin; Solène Couespel; Hatem Necib; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Catherine Ansquer; Thomas Carlier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  54 in total

1.  CT imaging markers to improve radiation toxicity prediction in prostate cancer radiotherapy by stacking regression algorithm.

Authors:  Shayan Mostafaei; Hamid Abdollahi; Shiva Kazempour Dehkordi; Isaac Shiri; Abolfazl Razzaghdoust; Seyed Hamid Zoljalali Moghaddam; Afshin Saadipoor; Fereshteh Koosha; Susan Cheraghi; Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis.

Authors:  Alex Zwanenburg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Direct attenuation correction of brain PET images using only emission data via a deep convolutional encoder-decoder (Deep-DAC).

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Pardis Ghafarian; Parham Geramifar; Kevin Ho-Yin Leung; Mostafa Ghelichoghli; Mehrdad Oveisi; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Prediction of local recurrence and distant metastasis using radiomics analysis of pretreatment nasopharyngeal [18F]FDG PET/CT images.

Authors:  Lihong Peng; Xiaotong Hong; Qingyu Yuan; Lijun Lu; Quanshi Wang; Wufan Chen
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  Robustness versus disease differentiation when varying parameter settings in radiomics features: application to nasopharyngeal PET/CT.

Authors:  Wenbing Lv; Qingyu Yuan; Quanshi Wang; Jianhua Ma; Jun Jiang; Wei Yang; Qianjin Feng; Wufan Chen; Arman Rahmim; Lijun Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Next-Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Hasan Maleki; Ghasem Hajianfar; Hamid Abdollahi; Saeed Ashrafinia; Mathieu Hatt; Habib Zaidi; Mehrdad Oveisi; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Lei Yang; Di Dong; Mengjie Fang; Yongbei Zhu; Yali Zang; Zhenyu Liu; Hongmei Zhang; Jianming Ying; Xinming Zhao; Jie Tian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Application of a Machine Learning Approach for the Analysis of Clinical and Radiomic Features of Pretreatment [18F]-FDG PET/CT to Predict Prognosis of Patients with Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Megumi Jinguji; Atsushi Tani; Hidehiko Kikuno; Daisuke Hirahara; Shinichi Togami; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  John P Crandall; Tyler J Fraum; MinYoung Lee; Linda Jiang; Perry Grigsby; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Experimental phantom evaluation to identify robust positron emission tomography (PET) radiomic features.

Authors:  Montserrat Carles; Tobias Fechter; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Dimos Baltas; Michael Mix
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.