Literature DB >> 20101396

Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements.

J M Galea1, S A Sami, N B Albert, R C Miall.   

Abstract

Motor adaptation is impaired by the performance of a secondary task which divides cognitive resources. Additionally, we previously reported slowed adaptation when participants were required to switch from one visual displacement adaptation task to another. Here, we examined whether a dividing secondary task had a similar effect on adaptation as switching between opposing visual displacements. The resource-dividing task involved simultaneously adapting to a step-visual displacement whilst vocally shadowing an auditory stimulus. The switching task required participants to adapt to opposing visual displacements in an alternating manner with the left and right hands. We found that both manipulations had a detrimental effect on adaptation rate. We then integrated these tasks and found the combination caused a greater decrease in adaptation rate than either manipulation in isolation. A second set of experiments showed that adaptation to a gradually imposed visual displacement was influenced in a similar manner to step adaptation. In summary, step adaptation slows the learning rate of gradual adaptation to a large degree, whereas gradual adaptation only slightly slows the learning rate of step adaptation. Therefore, although gradual adaptation involves minimal awareness it can still be disrupted with a cognitively demanding secondary task. We propose that awareness and cognitive resource can be regarded as qualitatively different, but that awareness may be a marker of the amount of resource required. For example, large errors are both noticed and require substantial cognitive resource. However, a lack of awareness does not mean an adaptation task will be resistant to interference from a resource-consuming secondary task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20101396      PMCID: PMC4962908          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2158-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evidence for processing stages in skill acquisition: a dual-task study.

Authors:  U Eversheim; O Bock
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Opher Donchin; Michael S Gazzaniga; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Learning and transfer of an ipsilateral coordination task: evidence for a dual-layer movement representation.

Authors:  Sophie Vangheluwe; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visual displacements during an alternating movement.

Authors:  J M Galea; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  21 in total

1.  Protection and expression of human motor memories.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Estimating the implicit component of visuomotor rotation learning by constraining movement preparation time.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Reece Gunn; Welber Marinovic; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural correlates of adaptation to gradual and to sudden visuomotor distortions in humans.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Christoph F Schorn; Otmar Bock; Nina Theysohn; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A rapid visuomotor response on the human upper limb is selectively influenced by implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Chao Gu; J Andrew Pruszynski; Paul L Gribble; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Reuter; Jeffery Bednark; Ross Cunnington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Contribution of explicit processes to reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Peter Holland; Olivier Codol; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Damien Pastor; Adrian M Haith; Yves Rossetti; Reza Shadmehr; Jacinta O'Shea
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Nola M Klemfuss; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.