Literature DB >> 25893908

Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study.

Eva-Maria Reuter1, Jeffery Bednark, Ross Cunnington.   

Abstract

Visuomotor adaptation involves the learning of a new mapping between a spatial goal and well-learned movements. In order to learn a new visuomotor transformation, visual attention is needed to monitor movements and their visual consequences. Once a transformation is learnt, it can be executed automatically without attentional control. Using steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) measured from EEG activity, we examined how visual attention changes during the early phase of visuomotor adaptation. SSVEPs were elicited by a green disc flickering at 15 Hz which was either the movement target or the cursor that participants controlled. Participants performed an adapted continuous visuomotor adaptation task with either 60° or 120° screen cursor rotation, and changes in 15-Hz SSVEP power were examined. Participants' performance improved over time in all conditions, with the rate of learning significantly influenced by the degree of rotation. SSVEPs at 15 Hz showed a significant change over time with adaptation for 60° rotations, but not for 120° rotations, such that SSVEPs elicited by the stimuli were significantly lower for 60° compared with 120° rotation conditions over the last adaptation blocks. This suggests that visual attention to the movement target and feedback reduces over time as performance improves during visuomotor adaptation for easier rotations, but must be maintained throughout the task for more difficult 120° rotations that might require more strategic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893908     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4275-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Annmarie MacNamara; Dan Foti; Jamie Ferri; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Relationship between sensorimotor adaptation and cognitive functions in younger and older subjects.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Michaela Girgenrath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives.

Authors:  François-Benoît Vialatte; Monique Maurice; Justin Dauwels; Andrzej Cichocki
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Shimojo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Changing patterns of eye-head coordination during 6 h of optically reversed vision.

Authors:  G Melvill Jones; D Guitton; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Functional relationship between cognitive representations of movement directions and visuomotor adaptation performance.

Authors:  Heiko Lex; Matthias Weigelt; Andreas Knoblauch; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation with different rotation angles.

Authors:  Sebastian Rentsch; Miya K Rand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neurofeedback Therapy for Enhancing Visual Attention: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

Authors:  Mehdi Ordikhani-Seyedlar; Mikhail A Lebedev; Helge B D Sorensen; Sadasivan Puthusserypady
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.