Literature DB >> 24449008

Neural correlates of adaptation to gradual and to sudden visuomotor distortions in humans.

Susen Werner1, Christoph F Schorn, Otmar Bock, Nina Theysohn, Dagmar Timmann.   

Abstract

This study aimed at scrutinizing the neural correlates of sensorimotor adaptation. Subjects were exposed either to a gradually (group G) or to a suddenly introduced perturbation (group S) followed by a test of aftereffects. They were also exposed to a control condition equated for their movement errors during the adaptation condition. We registered subjects' brain activity by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Behavioral data revealed no difference between aftereffects in G and S, while imaging data suggest different neural correlates. Direct comparison between groups showed more adaptation-related activation in left cingulate and inferior frontal as well as right caudate and temporal areas in S than in G. In contrast, no neural activity was related more to G than to S and no common activations were found for both groups. Within-group analyses further revealed right inferior parietal lobe, cerebellar and cingulate cortex activity in group S and activation of frontal lobe and left cerebellum in group G for a contrast between adaptation condition and baseline. Less brain activity was observed when controlled for movement errors: the contrast between adaptation and control condition yielded left occipital lobe activity in group S, and left posterior dentate nucleus and brainstem activity in group G. The present data confirm an involvement of the cerebellar cortex in error processing during sudden adaptation, since this activation was found for the contrast 'adaptation-baseline' but not for 'adaptation-control.' In addition, our data suggest an involvement of deep cerebellar nuclei in the adaptation to gradually introduced distortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449008     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3824-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

1.  A PET study of visuomotor learning under optical rotation.

Authors:  K Inoue; R Kawashima; K Satoh; S Kinomura; M Sugiura; R Goto; M Ito; H Fukuda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar activation during the learning of a visuomotor dissociation task.

Authors:  D Flament; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; K Ugurbil; T J Ebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly subjects.

Authors:  Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback depends on the number and spread of target directions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  15 in total

1.  Formation of model-free motor memories during motor adaptation depends on perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Disruption of M1 Activity during Performance Plateau Impairs Consolidation of Motor Memories.

Authors:  Raphaël Hamel; Maxime Trempe; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A rapid visuomotor response on the human upper limb is selectively influenced by implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Chao Gu; J Andrew Pruszynski; Paul L Gribble; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Minimizing Precision-Weighted Sensory Prediction Errors via Memory Formation and Switching in Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Youngmin Oh; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Prism Adaptation Modulates Connectivity of the Intraparietal Sulcus with Multiple Brain Networks.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Michael Freedberg; Stephen J Gotts; Catherine A Cunningham; Zaynah M Alam; Sarah Shomstein; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Awareness of sensorimotor adaptation to visual rotations of different size.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Bernice C van Aken; Thomas Hulst; Maarten A Frens; Jos N van der Geest; Heiko K Strüder; Opher Donchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.

Authors:  Simon P Orozco; Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.