Literature DB >> 16197699

Learning and transfer of an ipsilateral coordination task: evidence for a dual-layer movement representation.

Sophie Vangheluwe1, Nicole Wenderoth, Stephan P Swinnen.   

Abstract

The present study addressed the nature of the memory representation for interlimb coordination tasks. For this purpose, the acquisition of a multifrequency (2:1) task with the ipsilateral limbs and transfer to the ipsilateral and contralateral body side was examined. In particular, subjects practiced a 2:1 coordination pattern whereby the right arm moved twice as fast as the right leg, or vice versa. Subsequently, they transferred the practiced 2:1 task to three different conditions: (1) the converse partner (i.e., the slow-moving limb had to move fast, and vice versa) at the ipsilateral body side, and (2) the identical and (3) converse 2:1 pattern at the contralateral body side. Findings revealed positive transfer of the identical and converse 2:1 pattern to the contralateral body side. However, no transfer of the learned pattern to its converse partner at the same body side was revealed. We propose a new memory representation model for coordination patterns, composed of an effector-independent and effector-specific component (dual-layer model). It is hypothesized that the general movement goal (i.e., moving one limb twice as fast as the other) constitutes the abstract, higher-level representation that may account for positive contralateral transfer. Conversely, the effector-specific component contains task-specific lower-level muscle synergies that are acquired through practice, prohibiting positive transfer when shifting task allocation within the same effectors. These findings are consistent with recent neuroscientific evidence for neuroplastic changes in distributed brain areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197699     DOI: 10.1162/0898929054985392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Asymmetric interlimb transfer of concurrent adaptation to opposing dynamic forces.

Authors:  J M Galea; R C Miall; D G Woolley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effects of a two-step transfer on a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Christopher A Aiken; Zhujun Pan; Arend W A Van Gemmert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modification of existing human motor memories is enabled by primary cortical processing during memory reactivation.

Authors:  Nitzan Censor; Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Simulated practice effects on the transfer and retention of gait sequences from the upper to the lower extremity.

Authors:  Mohammad R Saeedpour-Parizi; Surabhi Shripad Date; Luis Dominguez; Tayebeh Baniasadi; John B Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements.

Authors:  J M Galea; S A Sami; N B Albert; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Use-Dependent Plasticity in Human Primary Motor Hand Area: Synergistic Interplay Between Training and Immobilization.

Authors:  Estelle Raffin; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.