Literature DB >> 16835793

Concurrent adaptation to opposing visual displacements during an alternating movement.

J M Galea1, R C Miall.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that, during tasks in which subjects are exposed to a visual rotation of cursor feedback, alternating bimanual adaptation to opposing rotations is as rapid as unimanual adaptation to a single rotation (Bock et al. in Exp Brain Res 162:513-519, 2005). However, that experiment did not test strict alternation of the limbs but short alternate blocks of trials. We have therefore tested adaptation under alternate left/right hand movement with opposing rotations. It was clear that the left and right hand, within the alternating conditions, learnt to adapt to the opposing displacements at a similar rate suggesting that two adaptive states were formed concurrently. We suggest that the separate limbs are used as contextual cues to switch between the relevant adaptive states. However, we found that during online correction the alternating conditions had a significantly slower rate of adaptation in comparison to the unimanual conditions. Control conditions indicate that the results are not directly due the alternation between limbs or to the constant switching of vision between the two eyes. The negative interference may originate from the requirement to dissociate the visual information of these two alternating displacements to allow online control of the two arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835793      PMCID: PMC3032178          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0585-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Anterior and posterior callosal contributions to simultaneous bimanual movements of the hands and fingers.

Authors:  J C Eliassen; K Baynes; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand.

Authors:  Rieko Osu; Satomi Hirai; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Bimanual training reduces spatial interference.

Authors:  Nicole Wenderoth; Veerle Puttemans; Sophie Vangheluwe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Sensorimotor adaptation to visual distortions with different kinematic coupling.

Authors:  Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Parieto-premotor areas mediate directional interference during bimanual movements.

Authors:  Nicole Wenderoth; Filiep Debaere; Stefan Sunaert; Paul van Hecke; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision.

Authors:  C S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Wada; Yasuhiro Kawabata; Shinya Kotosaka; Kenji Yamamoto; Shigeru Kitazawa; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.304

10.  How a lateralized brain supports symmetrical bimanual tasks.

Authors:  Roland S Johansson; Anna Theorin; Göran Westling; Mikael Andersson; Yukari Ohki; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  18 in total

1.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Inter-limb interference during bimanual adaptation to dynamic environments.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Vittorio Sanguineti; Valentina Squeri; Lorenzo Masia; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Concurrent adaptation to opposite visual distortions: impairment and cue.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-10

4.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A data-driven framework for selecting and validating digital health metrics: use-case in neurological sensorimotor impairments.

Authors:  Christoph M Kanzler; Mike D Rinderknecht; Anne Schwarz; Ilse Lamers; Cynthia Gagnon; Jeremia P O Held; Peter Feys; Andreas R Luft; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-29

6.  The extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor condition does not depend on awareness of the condition.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Mukta Joshi; Yuming Lei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Yan Xiao; Yonghong Yan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Simultaneous acquisition of multiple auditory-motor transformations in speech.

Authors:  Amélie Rochet-Capellan; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations by varying hand and body postures.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements.

Authors:  J M Galea; S A Sami; N B Albert; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.