Literature DB >> 21917998

Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Jordan A Taylor1, Greg J Wojaczynski, Richard B Ivry.   

Abstract

Studies of intermanual transfer have been used to probe representations formed during skill acquisition. We employ a new method that provides a continuous assay of intermanual transfer, intermixing right- and left-hand trials while limiting visual feedback to right-hand movements. We manipulated the degree of awareness of the visuomotor rotation, introducing a 22.5° perturbation in either an abrupt single step or gradually in ∼1° increments every 10 trials. Intermanual transfer was observed with the direction of left-hand movements shifting in the opposite direction of the rotation over the course of training. The transfer on left-hand trials was less than that observed in the right hand. Moreover, the magnitude of transfer was larger in our mixed-limb design compared with the standard blocked design in which transfer is only probed at the end of training. Transfer was similar in the abrupt and gradual groups, suggesting that awareness of the perturbation has little effect on intermanual transfer. In a final experiment, participants were provided with a strategy to offset an abrupt rotation, a method that has been shown to increase error over the course of training due to the operation of sensorimotor adaptation. This deterioration was also observed on left-hand probe trials, providing further support that awareness has little effect on intermanual transfer. These results indicate that intermanual transfer is not dependent on the implementation of cognitively assisted strategies that participants might adopt when they become aware that the visuomotor mapping has been perturbed. Rather, the results indicate that the information available to processes involved in adaptation entails some degree of effector independence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21917998      PMCID: PMC3234099          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01008.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Opher Donchin; Michael S Gazzaniga; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Bennett I Bertenthal; Annette M McCoy; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

4.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions.

Authors:  F A Kagerer; J L Contreras-Vidal; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Klassen; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  32 in total

1.  Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Anne Focke; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Generalization of perceptual and motor learning: a causal link with memory encoding and consolidation?

Authors:  N Censor
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motor adaptation and generalization of reaching movements using motor primitives based on spatial coordinates.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Stimulating the cerebellum affects visuomotor adaptation but not intermanual transfer of learning.

Authors:  Hannah Block; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Neural correlates of adaptation to gradual and to sudden visuomotor distortions in humans.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Christoph F Schorn; Otmar Bock; Nina Theysohn; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perturbation schedule does not alter retention of a locomotor adaptation across days.

Authors:  Sara J Hussain; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.