Literature DB >> 11048720

Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

K A Thoroughman1, R Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Understanding how the brain constructs movements remains a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. The brain may control complex movements through flexible combination of motor primitives, where each primitive is an element of computation in the sensorimotor map that transforms desired limb trajectories into motor commands. Theoretical studies have shown that a system's ability to learn action depends on the shape of its primitives. Using a time-series analysis of error patterns, here we show that humans learn the dynamics of reaching movements through a flexible combination of primitives that have gaussian-like tuning functions encoding hand velocity. The wide tuning of the inferred primitives predicts limitations on the brain's ability to represent viscous dynamics. We find close agreement between the predicted limitations and the subjects' adaptation to new force fields. The mathematical properties of the derived primitives resemble the tuning curves of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. The activity of these cells may encode primitives that underlie the learning of dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11048720      PMCID: PMC2556237          DOI: 10.1038/35037588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  26 in total

1.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching.

Authors:  C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.

Authors:  N Bhushan; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Differential effects of deep cerebellar nuclei inactivation on reaching and adaptive control.

Authors:  J H Martin; S E Cooper; A Hacking; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

5.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Miyauchi; T Tamada; Y Sasaki; R Takino; B Pütz; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; A B Schwartz; R E Kettner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action.

Authors:  J C Houk; S P Wise
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Cortical load compensation during voluntary elbow movements.

Authors:  B Conrad; K Matsunami; J Meyer-Lohmann; M Wiesendanger; V B Brooks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  336 in total

1.  Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; Z M Moussavi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses.

Authors:  T Wang; G S Dordevic; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field.

Authors:  E J Lai; A J Hodgson; T E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad Paul Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left ventral motor cortex enhances sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Laura Haenchen; Ayoub Daliri; Julia Chartove; Frank H Guenther; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  A theory for how sensorimotor skills are learned and retained in noisy and nonstationary neural circuits.

Authors:  Robert Ajemian; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Helene Moorman; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.