Literature DB >> 17507504

Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Ya-Weng Tseng1, Jörn Diedrichsen, John W Krakauer, Reza Shadmehr, Amy J Bastian.   

Abstract

The cerebellum is an essential part of the neural network involved in adapting goal-directed arm movements. This adaptation might rely on two distinct signals: a sensory prediction error or a motor correction. Sensory prediction errors occur when an initial motor command is generated but the predicted sensory consequences do not match the observed values. In some tasks, these sensory errors are monitored and result in on-line corrective motor output as the movement progresses. Here we asked whether cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching relies on sensory or on-line motor corrections. Healthy controls and people with hereditary cerebellar ataxia reached during a visuomotor perturbation in two conditions: "shooting" movements without on-line corrections and "pointing" movements that allowed for on-line corrections. Sensory (i.e., visual) errors were available in both conditions. Results showed that the addition of motor corrections did not influence adaptation in control subjects, suggesting that only sensory errors were needed for learning. Cerebellar subjects were comparably impaired in both adaptation conditions relative to controls, despite abnormal and inconsistent on-line motor correction. Specifically, poor on-line motor corrections were unrelated to cerebellar subjects' adaptation deficit (i.e., adaptation did not worsen), further suggesting that only sensory prediction errors influence this process. Therefore adaptation to visuomotor perturbations depends on the cerebellum and is driven by the mismatch between predicted and actual sensory outcome of motor commands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507504     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00266.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  339 in total

1.  Changes in muscle directional tuning parallel feedforward adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 4.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Beside the point: motor adaptation without feedback-based error correction in task-irrelevant conditions.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Iris L Shelly; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  How does the motor system correct for errors in time and space during locomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Error-driven learning in statistical summary perception.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Walking flexibility after hemispherectomy: split-belt treadmill adaptation and feedback control.

Authors:  Julia T Choi; Eileen P G Vining; Darcy S Reisman; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.