Literature DB >> 29537918

Contribution of explicit processes to reinforcement-based motor learning.

Peter Holland1, Olivier Codol1, Joseph M Galea1.   

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in the role of reward in motor learning, the underlying mechanisms remain ill defined. In particular, the contribution of explicit processes to reward-based motor learning is unclear. To address this, we examined subjects' ( n = 30) ability to learn to compensate for a gradually introduced 25° visuomotor rotation with only reward-based feedback (binary success/failure). Only two-thirds of subjects ( n = 20) were successful at the maximum angle. The remaining subjects initially followed the rotation but after a variable number of trials began to reach at an insufficiently large angle and subsequently returned to near-baseline performance ( n = 10). Furthermore, those who were successful accomplished this via a large explicit component, evidenced by a reduction in reach angle when they were asked to remove any strategy they employed. However, both groups displayed a small degree of remaining retention even after the removal of this explicit component. All subjects made greater and more variable changes in reach angle after incorrect (unrewarded) trials. However, subjects who failed to learn showed decreased sensitivity to errors, even in the initial period in which they followed the rotation, a pattern previously found in parkinsonian patients. In a second experiment, the addition of a secondary mental rotation task completely abolished learning ( n = 10), while a control group replicated the results of the first experiment ( n = 10). These results emphasize a pivotal role of explicit processes during reinforcement-based motor learning, and the susceptibility of this form of learning to disruption has important implications for its potential therapeutic benefits. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that learning a visuomotor rotation with only reward-based feedback is principally accomplished via the development of a large explicit component. Furthermore, this form of learning is susceptible to disruption with a secondary task. The results suggest that future experiments utilizing reward-based feedback should aim to dissect the roles of implicit and explicit reinforcement learning systems. Therapeutic motor learning approaches based on reward should be aware of the sensitivity to disruption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor learning; reward; strategies; visuomotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29537918      PMCID: PMC6032115          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00901.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Neuronal oscillations in Golgi cells and Purkinje cells are accompanied by decreases in Shannon information entropy.

Authors:  Jian-Jia Huang; Cheng-Tung Yen; Hen-Wai Tsao; Meng-Li Tsai; Chiming Huang
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Reward feedback accelerates motor learning.

Authors:  Ali A Nikooyan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The influence of movement preparation time on the expression of visuomotor learning and savings.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; David M Huberdeau; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Parallel explicit and implicit control of reaching.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; Nancy S Wexler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Overcoming motor "forgetting" through reinforcement of learned actions.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; Vincent S Huang; Adrian M Haith; Raymond J Delnicki; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A Meta-Analysis Suggests Different Neural Correlates for Implicit and Explicit Learning.

Authors:  Roman F Loonis; Scott L Brincat; Evan G Antzoulatos; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Elizabeth Mallia; John Rothwell; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The Statistical Determinants of the Speed of Motor Learning.

Authors:  Kang He; You Liang; Farnaz Abdollahi; Moria Fisher Bittmann; Konrad Kording; Kunlin Wei
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  29 in total

1.  Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hutter; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Exposure to Auditory Feedback Delay while Speaking Induces Perceptual Habituation but does not Mitigate the Disruptive Effect of Delay on Speech Auditory-motor Learning.

Authors:  Douglas M Shiller; Takashi Mitsuya; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Domain-Specific Working Memory, But Not Dopamine-Related Genetic Variability, Shapes Reward-Based Motor Learning.

Authors:  Peter Holland; Olivier Codol; Elizabeth Oxley; Madison Taylor; Elizabeth Hamshere; Shadiq Joseph; Laura Huffer; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Shintaro Uehara; Firas Mawase; Amanda S Therrien; Kendra M Cherry-Allen; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Somatosensory working memory in human reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Ananda Sidarta; Floris T van Vugt; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  De novo learning versus adaptation of continuous control in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  Christopher S Yang; Noah J Cowan; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.