Literature DB >> 1999694

The relative accuracies of two automated noninvasive arterial pressure measurement devices.

M S Gorback1, T J Quill, M L Lavine.   

Abstract

We compared the accuracies of two types of noninvasive blood pressure devices. Thirty-two patients requiring an intraarterial catheter for anesthetic management underwent simultaneous monitoring with Dinamap 1846SX and Ohmeda Finapres 3700 devices. For the first 10 minutes of recording, new Dinamap determinations were performed every 60 seconds; subsequent recordings were made at 3-minute intervals. Data were obtained at the time of new Dinamap readings, and twice between new readings to approximate the real-time performance of the two monitors. We defined superior accuracy as a statistically significant difference in mean absolute error greater than 5 mm Hg. With these criteria, pooled data from all patients revealed no difference in performance, even in real time. Pooled data can be misleading since there was a significant amount of variation in accuracy for both monitors. Therefore, we used nonparametric analysis to determine how many individual patients were monitored better by either device. When we compared only data from new Dinamap readings, the Finapres monitor showed superior performance for systolic readings in 13 patients, versus 6 patients for the Dinamap (P less than 0.05, chi-square test). Similar analysis for diastolic and mean pressure performance did not reach statistical significance. However, in real time, the Finapres unit monitored more patients more accurately for systolic (14 Finapres versus 3 Dinamap), diastolic (11 Finapres versus 3 Dinamap), and mean (10 Finapres versus 3 Dinamap) pressure determinations. The magnitude of these differences were, however, less dramatic than expected. This was probably due to stabilization of arterial pressure during the anesthetic, which minimized the error due to intermittent sampling. We conclude that continuous Finapres readings and new Dinamap determinations are equally accurate for diastolic and mean arterial pressures. The accuracy of Finapres appears to be slightly superior for systolic pressure. The intermittent sampling of oscillometric devices compromises their performance relative to the Finapres in many, but not all, cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1999694     DOI: 10.1007/bf01617893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.

Authors:  P G Loubser
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct

2.  Continuous, real-time, noninvasive monitor of blood pressure: Penaz methodology applied to the finger.

Authors:  R D Boehmer
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-10

3.  Direct versus indirect blood pressure measurements in critically ill patients.

Authors:  B Venus; M Mathru; R A Smith; C G Pham
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation.

Authors:  A J Rutten; A H Ilsley; G A Skowronski; W B Runciman
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.669

5.  Automatic blood pressure monitors. A clinical evaluation of five models in adults.

Authors:  C J Johnson; J H Kerr
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Clinical comparison of automated auscultatory and oscillometric and catheter-transducer measurements of arterial pressure.

Authors:  R F Davis
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1985-04

7.  Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger.

Authors:  N T Smith; K H Wesseling; B de Wit
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1985-01

8.  Effects of peripheral vasoconstriction on the blood pressure in the finger, measured continuously by a new noninvasive method (the Finapres).

Authors:  J C Dorlas; J A Nijboer; W T Butijn; G M van der Hoeven; J J Settels; K H Wesseling
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Noninvasive continuous blood pressure measurement from the finger: optimal measurement conditions and factors affecting reliability.

Authors:  T Kurki; N T Smith; N Head; H Dec-Silver; A Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-01

10.  Oscillometry and direct blood pressure: a comparative clinical study during deliberate hypotension.

Authors:  M Gourdeau; R Martin; Y Lamarche; L Tétreault
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Theoretical analysis of non-invasive oscillometric maximum amplitude algorithm for estimating mean blood pressure.

Authors:  P D Baker; D R Westenskow; K Kück
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Clinical evaluation of continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring: accuracy and tracking capabilities.

Authors:  C C Young; J B Mark; W White; A DeBree; J S Vender; A Fleming
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-07

3.  Indirect blood pressure measurement using the Riva Rocci Korotkoff method.

Authors:  H H Ros
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-03

4.  Assessment of the arterial tonometer (N-CAT) for the continuous blood pressure measurement in rapid atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  N R Searle; J Perrault; H Ste-Marie; C Dupont
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  A proposal for scientific validation of instruments for indirect blood pressure measurement at rest, during exercise, and in critical care.

Authors:  Y Iyriboz; C M Hearon
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-05

6.  Comparison of intraarterial with continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement in postoperative pediatric patients.

Authors:  J K Triedman; J P Saul
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-01

7.  The quality of social networks predicts age-related changes in cardiovascular reactivity to stress.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino; Robert G Kent de Grey; Sierra Cronan
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.