Literature DB >> 8126533

Comparison of intraarterial with continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement in postoperative pediatric patients.

J K Triedman1, J P Saul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the accuracy, bias, and frequency response of continuous blood pressure monitoring using finger photoplethysmography in children.
METHODS: To compare arterial blood pressure measured using the Finapres device with simultaneously measured intraarterial blood pressure we studied 27 randomly selected postoperative pediatric patients who were receiving a variety of inotropic and vasoactive agents at a cardiac intensive care unit in university-affiliated pediatric hospital.
RESULTS: Sixty-two of 66 attempts (94%) to obtain a noninvasive blood pressure measurement were successful. A total of 37,351 paired blood pressure measurements from 53 records were compared, revealing a measurement bias of -18.6 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and -13.4 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. The measurement bias increased proportionately to blood pressure, with systolic and diastolic gains between the noninvasive and intraarterial techniques of 0.86 and 0.75 mm Hg/mm Hg, respectively. The variation bias during each recording epoch, as measured by standard deviation of bias, was low (mean sigma systolic = 2.9 mm Hg; mean sigma diastolic = 2.0 mm Hg). The frequency response between the intraarterial and noninvasive pressure waveforms was flat to 10 Hz and approximately equal to 1.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial measurement bias exits between this noninvasive blood pressure measurement technique and intraarterial blood pressure. Measurements of the intrapatient variability and frequency response analysis suggest that the noninvasive technique accurately tracks intraarterial blood pressure over the short term. This technique may have useful applications in settings where intraarterial monitoring is undersirable or unobtainable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8126533     DOI: 10.1007/bf01651461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  23 in total

1.  Pressure measurement artifact with analog-to-digital conversion.

Authors:  L C Siegel; R G Pearl
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-10

2.  Comparative accuracies of a finger blood pressure monitor and an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.

Authors:  R H Epstein; S Huffnagle; R R Bartkowski
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-04

3.  Continuous finger arterial pressure: utility in the cardiovascular laboratory.

Authors:  B P Imholz; W Wieling; G J Langewouters; G A van Montfrans
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation.

Authors:  J P Saul; R D Berger; P Albrecht; S P Stein; M H Chen; R J Cohen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

5.  Experimental analysis of catheter-manometer systems in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  S F Hipkins; A J Rutten; W B Runciman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing.

Authors:  G Parati; R Casadei; A Groppelli; M Di Rienzo; G Mancia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Continuous, real-time, noninvasive monitor of blood pressure: Penaz methodology applied to the finger.

Authors:  R D Boehmer
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-10

8.  A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation.

Authors:  A J Rutten; A H Ilsley; G A Skowronski; W B Runciman
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.669

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Indirect measurement of blood pressure during exercise testing can be misleading.

Authors:  B A Gould; R S Hornung; D G Altman; P M Cashman; E B Raftery
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of short-term blood pressure variability in anesthetized children: a comparative study between intraarterial and finger blood pressure.

Authors:  I Constant; D Laude; J L Elghozi; I Murat
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Use of a neonatal blood pressure cuff to monitor blood pressure in the adult finger--comparison with a standard adult arm cuff.

Authors:  S Q Khan; J M Wardlaw; R Davenport; J Slattery; S Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.