PURPOSE: To investigate a fast, objective, and standardized method for analyzing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) applying principal component analysis (PCA) adjusted with a model-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D gradient-echo DCE breast images of 31 malignant and 38 benign lesions, recorded on a 1.5T scanner, were retrospectively analyzed by PCA and by the model-based three-timepoints (3TP) method. RESULTS: Intensity-scaled (IS) and enhancement-scaled (ES) datasets were reduced by PCA yielding a first IS-eigenvector that captured the signal variation between fat and fibroglandular tissue; two IS-eigenvectors and the two first ES-eigenvectors captured contrast-enhanced changes, whereas the remaining eigenvectors captured predominantly noise changes. Rotation of the two contrast-related eigenvectors led to a high congruence between the projection coefficients and the 3TP parameters. The ES-eigenvectors and the rotation angle were highly reproducible across malignant lesions, enabling calculation of a general rotated eigenvector base. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the projection coefficients of the two eigenvectors indicated high sensitivity of the first rotated eigenvector to detect lesions (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.97) and of the second rotated eigenvector to differentiate malignancy from benignancy (AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSION: PCA adjusted with a model-based method provided a fast and objective computer-aided diagnostic tool for breast DCE-MRI.
PURPOSE: To investigate a fast, objective, and standardized method for analyzing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) applying principal component analysis (PCA) adjusted with a model-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D gradient-echo DCE breast images of 31 malignant and 38 benign lesions, recorded on a 1.5T scanner, were retrospectively analyzed by PCA and by the model-based three-timepoints (3TP) method. RESULTS: Intensity-scaled (IS) and enhancement-scaled (ES) datasets were reduced by PCA yielding a first IS-eigenvector that captured the signal variation between fat and fibroglandular tissue; two IS-eigenvectors and the two first ES-eigenvectors captured contrast-enhanced changes, whereas the remaining eigenvectors captured predominantly noise changes. Rotation of the two contrast-related eigenvectors led to a high congruence between the projection coefficients and the 3TP parameters. The ES-eigenvectors and the rotation angle were highly reproducible across malignant lesions, enabling calculation of a general rotated eigenvector base. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the projection coefficients of the two eigenvectors indicated high sensitivity of the first rotated eigenvector to detect lesions (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.97) and of the second rotated eigenvector to differentiate malignancy from benignancy (AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSION: PCA adjusted with a model-based method provided a fast and objective computer-aided diagnostic tool for breast DCE-MRI.
Authors: M V Knopp; E Weiss; H P Sinn; J Mattern; H Junkermann; J Radeleff; A Magener; G Brix; S Delorme; I Zuna; G van Kaick Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Luminita A Tudorica; Karen Y Oh; Nicole Roy; Mark D Kettler; Yiyi Chen; Stephanie L Hemmingson; Aneela Afzal; John W Grinstead; Gerhard Laub; Xin Li; Wei Huang Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Alana R Amarosa; Jason McKellop; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Melanie Moccaldi; Tess V Clendenen; James S Babb; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Linda Moy; Sungheon Kim Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nandinee Fariah Haq; Piotr Kozlowski; Edward C Jones; Silvia D Chang; S Larry Goldenberg; Mehdi Moradi Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Eralda Mema; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Ralph T Wynn; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Alana A Lewin; Sungheon Gene Kim; James S Babb; Amy N Melsaether; Jason McKellop; Melanie Moccaldi; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 3.173