Literature DB >> 22770687

A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings.

Luminita A Tudorica1, Karen Y Oh, Nicole Roy, Mark D Kettler, Yiyi Chen, Stephanie L Hemmingson, Aneela Afzal, John W Grinstead, Gerhard Laub, Xin Li, Wei Huang.   

Abstract

Three dimensional bilateral imaging is the standard for most clinical breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI protocols. Because of high spatial resolution (sRes) requirement, the typical 1-2 min temporal resolution (tRes) afforded by a conventional full-k-space-sampling gradient echo (GRE) sequence precludes meaningful and accurate pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE time-course data. The commercially available, GRE-based, k-space undersampling and data sharing TWIST (time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories) sequence was used in this study to perform DCE-MRI exams on thirty one patients (with 36 suspicious breast lesions) before their biopsies. The TWIST DCE-MRI was immediately followed by a single-frame conventional GRE acquisition. Blinded from each other, three radiologist readers assessed agreements in multiple lesion morphology categories between the last set of TWIST DCE images and the conventional GRE images. Fleiss' κ test was used to evaluate inter-reader agreement. The TWIST DCE time-course data were subjected to quantitative pharmacokinetic analyses. With a four-channel phased-array breast coil, the TWIST sequence produced DCE images with 20 s or less tRes and ~ 1.0×1.0×1.4 mm(3) sRes. There were no significant differences in signal-to-noise (P=.45) and contrast-to-noise (P=.51) ratios between the TWIST and conventional GRE images. The agreements in morphology evaluations between the two image sets were excellent with the intra-reader agreement ranging from 79% for mass margin to 100% for mammographic density and the inter-reader κ value ranging from 0.54 (P<.0001) for lesion size to 1.00 (P<.0001) for background parenchymal enhancement. Quantitative analyses of the DCE time-course data provided higher breast cancer diagnostic accuracy (91% specificity at 100% sensitivity) than the current clinical practice of morphology and qualitative kinetics assessments. The TWIST sequence may be used in clinical settings to acquire high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI images for both precise lesion morphology characterization and accurate pharmacokinetic analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770687      PMCID: PMC3466402          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  46 in total

1.  Feasibility of high temporal resolution breast DCE-MRI using compressed sensing theory.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Yanwei Miao; Kun Zhou; Yanming Yu; Shanglian Bao; Qiang He; Yongming Dai; Stephanie Y Xuan; Bisher Tarabishy; Yongquan Ye; Jiani Hu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Characterization of breast masses by dynamic enhanced MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  O Ikeda; Y Yamashita; S Morishita; T Kido; M Kitajima; K Okamura; S Fukuda; M Takahashi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Steven P Sourbron; David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The influence of radial undersampling schemes on compressed sensing reconstruction in breast MRI.

Authors:  Rachel W Chan; Elizabeth A Ramsay; Edward Y Cheung; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations.

Authors:  W A Kaiser; E Zeitler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Luminita A Tudorica; Xin Li; Sunitha B Thakur; Yiyi Chen; Elizabeth A Morris; Ian J Tagge; Maayan E Korenblit; William D Rooney; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Quantitative effects of using compressed sensing in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  David S Smith; E Brian Welch; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Mary E Loveless; Tatsuki Koyama; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Early changes in functional dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predict for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Mei-Lin W Ah-See; Andreas Makris; N Jane Taylor; Mark Harrison; Paul I Richman; Russell J Burcombe; J James Stirling; James A d'Arcy; David J Collins; Michael R Pittam; Duraisamy Ravichandran; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Fabian Kiessling; Robert Lucht; Susanne Darai; Klaus Wasser; Stefan Delorme; Jürgen Griebel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  A modified logistic model to describe gadolinium kinetics in breast tumors.

Authors:  Peter J Moate; Lawrence Dougherty; Mitchell D Schnall; Richard J Landis; Raymond C Boston
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  29 in total

1.  Dynamic field-of-view imaging to increase temporal resolution in the early phase of contrast media uptake in breast DCE-MRI: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Federico D Pineda; Ty O Easley; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Influence of scan duration on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for breast lesions: a study based on CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique.

Authors:  Wen Hao; Bin Zhao; Guangbin Wang; Cuiyan Wang; Hui Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Feasibility analysis of early temporal kinetics as a surrogate marker for breast tumor type, grade, and aggressiveness.

Authors:  Laura Heacock; Alana A Lewin; Yiming Gao; James S Babb; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; Neeti Bagadiya; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xin Li; Yiyi Chen; Xia Li; Ming-Ching Chang; Matthew J Oborski; Dariya I Malyarenko; Mark Muzi; Guido H Jajamovich; Andriy Fedorov; Alina Tudorica; Sandeep N Gupta; Charles M Laymon; Kenneth I Marro; Hadrien A Dyvorne; James V Miller; Daniel P Barbodiak; Thomas L Chenevert; Thomas E Yankeelov; James M Mountz; Paul E Kinahan; Ron Kikinis; Bachir Taouli; Fiona Fennessy; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.

Authors:  Courtney K Morrison; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Wendy B DeMartini; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Ryan J Bosca; Frank R Korosec; Roberta M Strigel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Comparison of conventional DCE-MRI and a novel golden-angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity.

Authors:  Laura Heacock; Yiming Gao; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; James S Babb; Tobias K Block; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A novel framework for evaluating the image accuracy of dynamic MRI and the application on accelerated breast DCE MRI.

Authors:  Yuan Le; Marcel Dominik Nickel; Stephan Kannengiesser; Berthold Kiefer; Bruce Spottiswoode; Brian Dale; Victor Soon; Chen Lin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Combined reading of Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging by using a simple sum score.

Authors:  Anja Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Clemens G Kaiser; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Multiparametric MR Imaging of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Melanie Freed; Kerryanne Winters; Sungheon G Kim
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.