Literature DB >> 15034745

Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast.

Botond K Szabó1, Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg, Beata Boné, Peter Aspelin.   

Abstract

The discriminative ability of established diagnostic criteria for MRI of the breast is assessed, and their relative relevance using artificial neural networks (ANNs) is determined. A total of 89 women with 105 histopathologically verified breast lesions (73 invasive cancers, 2 in situ cancers, and 30 benign lesions) were included in this study. A T1-weighted 3D FLASH sequence was acquired before and seven times after the intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight. ANN models were built to test the discriminative ability of kinetic, morphologic, and combined MR features. The subjects were randomly divided into two parts: a training set of 59 lesions and a verification set of 46 lesions. The training set was used for learning, and the performance of each model was evaluated on the verification set by measuring the area under the ROC curve (Az). An optimally minimized model was constructed using the most relevant input variables that were determined by the automatic relevance determination (ARD) method. ANN models were compared with the performance of a human reader. Margin type, time-to-peak enhancement, and washout ratio showed the highest discriminative ability among diagnostic criteria and comprised the minimized model. Compared with the expert radiologist (Az = 0.799), using the same prediction scale, the minimized ANN model performed best (Az = 0.771), followed by the best kinetic (Az = 0.743), the maximized (Az = 0.727), and the morphologic model (Az = 0.678). The performance of a neural network prediction model is comparable to that of an expert radiologist. A neurostatistical approach is preferred for the analysis of diagnostic criteria when many parameters are involved and complex nonlinear relationships exist in the data set. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15034745     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2280-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks: opening the black box.

Authors:  J E Dayhoff; J M DeLeo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors.

Authors:  M V Knopp; E Weiss; H P Sinn; J Mattern; H Junkermann; J Radeleff; A Magener; G Brix; S Delorme; I Zuna; G van Kaick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Use of an artificial neural network to determine the diagnostic value of specific clinical and radiologic parameters in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease on chest radiographs.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Abe; Kazuto Ashizawa; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Heber MacMahon; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  MRI of breast tumors.

Authors:  C K Kuhl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  F Baum; U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions.

Authors:  M Kristoffersen Wiberg; P Aspelin; L Perbeck; B Boné
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Calvarial eosinophilic granuloma: diagnostic models and image feature selection with a neural network.

Authors:  E Arana; L Martí-Bonmatí; D Bautista; R Paredes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Application of magnetic resonance imaging to angiogenesis in breast cancer.

Authors:  M O Leach
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  18 in total

1.  Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.

Authors:  Toni W Vomweg; Andrea Teifke; R Peter Kunz; Christian Hintze; Alexander Hlawatsch; Annett Kern; Karl F Kreitner; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis of high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI in the classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen Giger; Milica Medved; Hui Li; Abbie Wood; Yading Yuan; Li Lan; Angelica Marquez; Greg Karczmar; Gillian Newstead
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; C Stockamp; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Classification of small contrast enhancing breast lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of morphological criteria and dynamic analysis based on unsupervised vector-quantization.

Authors:  Thomas Schlossbauer; Gerda Leinsinger; Axel Wismuller; Oliver Lange; Michael Scherr; Anke Meyer-Baese; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  [Quantitative parametric analysis of contrast-enhanced lesions in dynamic MR mammography].

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Megan Rakoczy; Donald McGaughey; Michael J Korenberg; Jacob Levman; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Gillian M Newstead; Ulrich Bick; Sanaz A Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Small lesions evaluation based on unsupervised cluster analysis of signal-intensity time courses in dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  A Meyer-Baese; T Schlossbauer; O Lange; A Wismueller
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-01

10.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Dustin Newell; Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Hon J Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.