Literature DB >> 17574132

Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Lorenzo L Pesce1, Charles E Metz.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Estimation of ROC curves and their associated indices from experimental data can be problematic, especially in multireader, multicase (MRMC) observer studies. Wilcoxon estimates of area under the curve (AUC) can be strongly biased with categorical data, whereas the conventional binormal ROC curve-fitting model may produce unrealistic fits. The "proper" binormal model (PBM) was introduced by Metz and Pan to provide acceptable fits for both sturdy and problematic datasets, but other investigators found that its first software implementation was numerically unstable in some situations. Therefore, we created an entirely new algorithm to implement the PBM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paper describes in detail the new PBM curve-fitting algorithm, which was designed to perform successfully in all problematic situations encountered previously. Extensive testing was conducted also on a broad variety of simulated and real datasets. Windows, Linux, and Apple Macintosh OS X versions of the algorithm are available online at http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/.
RESULTS: Plots of fitted curves as well as summaries of AUC estimates and their standard errors are reported. The new algorithm never failed to converge and produced good fits for all of the several million datasets on which it was tested. For all but the most problematic datasets, the algorithm also produced very good estimates of AUC standard error. The AUC estimates compared well with Wilcoxon estimates for continuously distributed data and are expected to be superior for categorical data.
CONCLUSION: This implementation of the PBM is reliable in a wide variety of ROC curve-fitting tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17574132      PMCID: PMC2693394          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  25 in total

1.  Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  S V Beiden; R F Wagner; G Campbell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  J Shiraishi; S Katsuragawa; J Ikezoe; T Matsumoto; T Kobayashi; K Komatsu; M Matsui; H Fujita; Y Kodera; K Doi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks.

Authors:  M A Kupinski; D C Edwards; M L Giger; C E Metz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Sergey V Beiden; Kevin S Berbaum; Stephen L Hillis; Hemant Ishwaran; Hae Hiang Song; Robert F Wagner
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve.

Authors:  D K McClish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates.

Authors:  C A Roe; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data.

Authors:  A Y Toledano; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  51 in total

1.  Comparison of 3D OS-EM and 4D MAP-RBI-EM reconstruction algorithms for cardiac motion abnormality classification using a motion observer.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Taek-Soo Lee; Xin He; W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 1.679

2.  Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed images.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Xiaobing Fan; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Abbie M Wood; Akiko Shimauchi; Kirti Kulkarni; Marko K Ivancevic; Lorenzo L Pesce; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

4.  Comparison of detectability of a simple object with low contrast displayed on a high-brightness color LCD and a monochrome LCD.

Authors:  Keita Takahashi; Junji Morishita; Takeshi Hiwasa; Shiro Hatanaka; Shuji Sakai; Noriyuki Hashimoto; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Fukai Toyofuku; Yoshiharu Higashida; Masafumi Ohki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-06-12

5.  Detectability of a lung nodule displayed on a liquid-crystal display monitor with different maximum luminance settings.

Authors:  Keita Takahashi; Masaki Sueoka; Yongsu Yoon; Takeshi Hiwasa; Shiro Hatanaka; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Noriyuki Hashimoto; Masafumi Ohki; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

6.  Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Yading Yuan; Neha Bhooshan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: potential impact of the "Last" experimentally measured operating point.

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison of spin echo T1-weighted sequences versus fast spin-echo proton density-weighted sequences for evaluation of meniscal tears at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Andrew B Wolff; Lorenzo L Pesce; Jim S Wu; L Ryan Smart; Michael J Medvecky; Andrew H Haims
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Yading Yuan; Weijie Chen; Karla Horsch; Li Lan; Andrew R Jamieson; Charlene A Sennett; Sanaz A Jansen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.