Literature DB >> 30214595

Texture features and pharmacokinetic parameters in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Qingliang Niu1, Xiaomei Jiang1, Qin Li1, Zhaolong Zheng1, Hanwang Du1, Shasha Wu1, Xuexi Zhang2.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has become a powerful tool for the diagnosis of breast cancer in the clinical setting due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Ktrans and area under the curve (AUC), and texture features derived from DCE-MRI have been used to specify the characteristics inside tumors. In the present study, 56 patients (average age 45.3±11.1; range 25-69 years) with histopathologically proved breast tumors were analyzed using the pharmacokinetic parameters and texture features. Malignant tumors displayed higher Ktrans and AUC values than the benign, Ktrans exhibited a significantly difference between the malignant and benign tumors (P=0.001) compared with the AUC values (P=0.029); texture features from DCE-MRI images and pharmacokinetic parameter maps also showed a good diagnostic ability. Alongside the routine method, principal components analysis (PCA) and Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) were employed on these texture features to differentiate the breast lesions automatically. The Factor-1 scores of PCA were used to divide the patients into two groups, and the diagnosing accuracies of the FDA method on the texture features from DCE-MRI images, Ktrans maps, AUC maps were 93, 98 and 98%, with a cross validation accuracies of 82, 77 and 77%, respectively. To conclude, pharmacokinetic parameters, texture features and the combined computer-assisted classification method were discussed. All method involved in this study may be a potential assisted tool for radiological analysis on breast.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fisher discriminant analysis; dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; pharmacokinetic parameters; principal component analysis; texture analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30214595      PMCID: PMC6126147          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  25 in total

Review 1.  Texture analysis of medical images.

Authors:  G Castellano; L Bonilha; L M Li; F Cendes
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Application of histogram analysis for the evaluation of vascular permeability in glioma by the K2 parameter obtained with the dynamic susceptibility contrast method: Comparisons with Ktrans obtained with the dynamic contrast enhance method and cerebral blood volume.

Authors:  Toshiaki Taoka; Hisashi Kawai; Toshiki Nakane; Saeka Hori; Tomoko Ochi; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Masahiko Sakamoto; Kimihiko Kichikawa; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Radiomic Profiling of Glioblastoma: Identifying an Imaging Predictor of Patient Survival with Improved Performance over Established Clinical and Radiologic Risk Models.

Authors:  Philipp Kickingereder; Sina Burth; Antje Wick; Michael Götz; Oliver Eidel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch; David Bonekamp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Preliminary data using computed tomography texture analysis for the classification of hypervascular liver lesions: generation of a predictive model on the basis of quantitative spatial frequency measurements--a work in progress.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; James L Schroeder; Peng Huang; Yifei Chen; Stephanie F Coquia; Satomi Kawamoto; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Kirsi Holli; Anna-Leena Lääperi; Lara Harrison; Tiina Luukkaala; Terttu Toivonen; Pertti Ryymin; Prasun Dastidar; Seppo Soimakallio; Hannu Eskola
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Li; Yongshan Zhu; Houyi Kang; Yulong Zhang; Huaping Liang; Sumei Wang; Weiguo Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  DCE-MRI and DWI Integration for Breast Lesions Assessment and Heterogeneity Quantification.

Authors:  C Andrés Méndez; Francesca Pizzorni Ferrarese; Paul Summers; Giuseppe Petralia; Gloria Menegaz
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Characteristics of quantitative perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mammographically occult breast cancer.

Authors:  Jung Kyu Ryu; Sun Jung Rhee; Jeong Yoon Song; Soo Hyun Cho; Geon-Ho Jahng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiomics derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic protocol features: the value of precision diagnosis ovarian neoplasms.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Song; Jia-Liang Ren; Dan Zhao; Lifang Wang; Honghong Ren; Jinliang Niu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.