Literature DB >> 25323603

Influence of scan duration on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for breast lesions: a study based on CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique.

Wen Hao1, Bin Zhao, Guangbin Wang, Cuiyan Wang, Hui Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of scan duration on pharmacokinetic parameters and their performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.
METHODS: Dynamic breast imaging was performed on a 3.0-T MR system using a prototype CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWISTVIBE (CDT-VIBE) sequence with a temporal resolution of 11.9 s. Enrolled in the study were 53 women with 55 lesions (26 benign and 29 malignant). Pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, ve , kep and iAUC) were calculated for various scan durations from 1 to 7 min after injection of contrast medium using the Tofts model.
RESULTS: Ktrans, kep and ve calculated from the 1-min dataset were significantly different from those calculated from the other datasets. In benign lesions, Ktrans, kep and ve were significantly different only between 1 min and 2 min (corrected P > 0.05), but in malignant lesions there were significant differences for any of the comparisons up to 6 min vs. 7 min (corrected P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in AUCs for any of the parameters (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI the scan duration has a significant impact on pharmacokinetic parameters, but the diagnostic ability may not be significantly affected. A scan duration of 5 min after injection of contrast medium may be sufficient for calculation of Tofts model pharmacokinetic parameters. KEY POINTS: • Scan duration of DCE-MRI breast imaging has a significant impact on pharmacokinetic parameters • A scan duration of less than 2 min results in spurious parameter estimates • The initial 2 min are important for both benign and malignant lesions • In malignant lesions the impact extends to 4 - 6 min • The differentiation ability of parameters may not be affected by scan duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25323603     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3451-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression.

Authors:  Yuan Le; Randall Kroeker; Hal D Kipfer; Chen Lin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings.

Authors:  Luminita A Tudorica; Karen Y Oh; Nicole Roy; Mark D Kettler; Yiyi Chen; Stephanie L Hemmingson; Aneela Afzal; John W Grinstead; Gerhard Laub; Xin Li; Wei Huang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Current breast imaging modalities, advances, and impact on breast care.

Authors:  Evelyn M Garcia; Erik S Storm; Lisa Atkinson; Eileen Kenny; Lisa S Mitchell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 5.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  The precision of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of sampling frequency and duration.

Authors:  Hugo J W L Aerts; K Jaspers; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimizing MRI scan time in the computation of pharmacokinetic parameters (K(trans) ) in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Amarnath Jena; Shashi Bhushan Mehta; Sangeeta Taneja
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.

Authors:  Riham H El Khouli; Katarzyna J Macura; Ihab R Kamel; Michael A Jacobs; David A Bluemke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Pharmacokinetic mapping for lesion classification in dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Glen R Morrell; Karen Y Oh; Cheryl A Walczak; R Brad Barlow; Leigh A Neumayer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  Anagha Deshmane; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer using a golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE sequence: comparison with the conventional contrast-enhanced breath-hold 3D VIBE sequence.

Authors:  Huan-Huan Li; Hui Zhu; Lei Yue; Yi Fu; Robert Grimm; Alto Stemmer; Cai-Xia Fu; Wei-Jun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comprehensive Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast With Fat/Water Separation and High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using Radial Sampling, Compressed Sensing, and Parallel Imaging.

Authors:  Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Samantha Heller; Melanie Moccaldi; Daniel K Sodickson; Sungheon Gene Kim; Linda Moy
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative prediction of intraductal component in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Hao Xu; Jieke Liu; Zhe Chen; Chunhua Wang; Yuanyuan Liu; Min Wang; Peng Zhou; Hongbing Luo; Jing Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE.

Authors:  Kun Sun; Hong Zhu; Weimin Chai; Ying Zhan; Dominik Nickel; Robert Grimm; Caixia Fu; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantitative Multiparametric MRI as an Imaging Biomarker for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Receptor Status and Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Zhiqi Yang; Xiaofeng Chen; Tianhui Zhang; Fengyan Cheng; Yuting Liao; Xiangguan Chen; Zhuozhi Dai; Weixiong Fan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.