Literature DB >> 22887470

Characterization of estrogen-receptor-targeted contrast agents in solution, breast cancer cells, and tumors in vivo.

Adi Pais1, Inbal Eti Biton, Raanan Margalit, Hadassa Degani.   

Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a major prognostic biomarker of breast cancer, currently determined in surgical specimens by immunohistochemistry. Two new ER-targeted probes, pyridine-tetra-acetate-Gd chelate (PTA-Gd) conjugated either to 17β-estradiol (EPTA-Gd) or to tamoxifen (TPTA-Gd), were explored as contrast agents for molecular imaging of ER. In solution, both probes exhibited a micromolar ER binding affinity, fast water exchange rate (∼10(7) s(-1)), and water proton-relaxivity of 4.7-6.8 mM(-1) s(-1). In human breast cancer cells, both probes acted as estrogen agonists and enhanced the water protons T1 relaxation rate and relaxivity in ER-positive as compared to ER-negative cells, with EPTA-Gd showing a higher ER-specific relaxivity than TPTA-Gd. In studies of breast cancer tumors in vivo, EPTA-Gd induced the highest enhancement in ER-positive tumors as compared to ER-negative tumors and muscle tissue, enabling in vivo detection of ER. TPTA-Gd demonstrated the highest enhancement in muscle tissue indicating nonspecific interaction of this agent with muscle components. The extracellular contrast agents, PTA-Gd and GdDTPA, showed no difference in the perfusion capacity of ER-positive and -negative tumors confirming the specific interaction of EPTA-Gd with ER. These findings lay a basis for the molecular imaging of the ER using EPTA-Gd as a template for further developments.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22887470      PMCID: PMC4547469          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  59 in total

Review 1.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  The interaction of MS-325 with human serum albumin and its effect on proton relaxation rates.

Authors:  Peter Caravan; Normand J Cloutier; Matthew T Greenfield; Sarah A McDermid; Stephen U Dunham; Jeff W M Bulte; John C Amedio; Richard J Looby; Ronald M Supkowski; William DeW Horrocks; Thomas J McMurry; Randall B Lauffer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the estrogen receptor in an orthotopic model of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Adi Pais; Chidambaram Gunanathan; Raanan Margalit; Inbal Eti Biton; Ady Yosepovich; David Milstein; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Molecular dynamics simulations of MRI-relevant GdIII chelates: direct access to outer-sphere relaxivity.

Authors:  A Borel; L Helm; A E Merbach
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2001-02-02       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  High relaxivity magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Part 1. Impact of single donor atom substitution on relaxivity of serum albumin-bound gadolinium complexes.

Authors:  Stéphane Dumas; Vincent Jacques; Wei-Chuan Sun; Jeffrey S Troughton; Joel T Welch; Jaclyn M Chasse; Heribert Schmitt-Willich; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Immunohistochemical and biochemical measurement of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer. Correlation of histopathology and prognostic factors.

Authors:  M Stierer; H Rosen; R Weber; H Hanak; J Spona; H Tüchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; David A Mankoff; Thomas Lawton; Kevin Yagle; Erin K Schubert; Svetlana Stekhova; Allen Gown; Jeanne M Link; Timothy Tewson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  3V: cavity, channel and cleft volume calculator and extractor.

Authors:  Neil R Voss; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Mary Anne Rossing; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

1.  Targeted Gold Nanoparticle⁻Oligonucleotide Contrast Agents in Combination with a New Local Voxel-Wise MRI Analysis Algorithm for In Vitro Imaging of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rajat Chauhan; Nagwa El-Baz; Robert S Keynton; Kurtis T James; Danial A Malik; Mingming Zhu; Ayman El-Baz; Chin K Ng; Paula J Bates; Mohammad Tariq Malik; Martin G O'Toole
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Progesterone-targeted magnetic resonance imaging probes.

Authors:  Taryn R Townsend; Georgette Moyle-Heyrman; Preeti A Sukerkar; Keith W MacRenaris; Joanna E Burdette; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Contrast Agents for Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Cancer Hormonal Status.

Authors:  Adi Pais; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.