Literature DB >> 23657893

Evaluation of the kinetic properties of background parenchymal enhancement throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle.

Alana R Amarosa1, Jason McKellop, Ana Paula Klautau Leite, Melanie Moccaldi, Tess V Clendenen, James S Babb, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Linda Moy, Sungheon Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and apply a semiautomatic method of segmenting fibroglandular tissue to quantify magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast material-enhancement kinetics of breast background parenchyma (BP) and lesions throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle in women with benign and malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, and informed consent was waived. From December 2008 to August 2011, 58 premenopausal women who had undergone contrast material-enhanced MR imaging and MR imaging-guided biopsy were identified. The longest time from the start of the last known period was 34 days. One lesion per patient (37 benign and 21 malignant) was analyzed. The patient groups were stratified according to the week of the menstrual cycle when MR imaging was performed. A method based on principal component analysis (PCA) was applied for quantitative analysis of signal enhancement in the BP and lesions by using the percentage of slope and percentage of enhancement. Linear regression and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess the association between the kinetic parameters and the week of the menstrual cycle.
RESULTS: In the women with benign lesions, percentages of slope and enhancement for both BP and lesions during week 2 were significantly (P < .05) lower than those in week 4. Percentage of enhancement in the lesion in week 2 was lower than that in week 3 (P < .05). The MR images of women with malignant lesions showed no significant difference between the weeks for any of the parameters. There was a strong positive correlation between lesion and BP percentage of slope (r = 0.72) and between lesion and BP percentage of enhancement (r = 0.67) in the benign group. There was also a significant (P = .03) difference in lesion percentage of slope between the benign and malignant groups at week 2.
CONCLUSION: The PCA-based method can quantify contrast enhancement kinetics of BP semiautomatically, and kinetics of BP and lesions vary according to the week of the menstrual cycle in benign but not in malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657893      PMCID: PMC3721056          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  44 in total

1.  Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Ricardo Otazo; Daniel Kim; Leon Axel; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Controversies on the management of high-risk lesions at core biopsy from a radiology/pathology perspective.

Authors:  Dianne Georgian-Smith; Thomas J Lawton
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Model-based and model-free parametric analysis of breast dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Erez Eyal; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 5.  Fundamentals of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Paldino; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up.

Authors:  Niamh M Hambly; Laura Liberman; D David Dershaw; Sandra Brennan; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Akiko Shimauchi; Lindsay Zak; Xiaobing Fan; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment.

Authors:  Riham H El Khouli; Katarzyna J Macura; Michael A Jacobs; Tarek H Khalil; Ihab R Kamel; Andrew Dwyer; David A Bluemke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Transcytolemmal water exchange in pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Sungheon Kim; Harry Quon; Laurie A Loevner; Mark A Rosen; Lawrence Dougherty; Alex M Kilger; Jerry D Glickson; Harish Poptani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Principal component analysis of breast DCE-MRI adjusted with a model-based method.

Authors:  Erez Eyal; Daria Badikhi; Edna Furman-Haran; Fredrick Kelcz; Kevin J Kirshenbaum; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bianca Bignotti; Alessio Signori; Francesca Valdora; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Giovanna Mariscotto; Alberto Tagliafico
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Marissa Albert; Freya Schnabel; Jennifer Chun; Shira Schwartz; Jiyon Lee; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.605

3.  Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Melanie Freed; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Jin Zhang; Claudia Seuss; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Multiparametric 18F-FDG PET/MRI of the Breast: Are There Differences in Imaging Biomarkers of Contralateral Healthy Tissue Between Patients With and Without Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Doris Leithner; Thomas H Helbich; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Maria Adele Marino; Daly Avendano; Danny F Martinez; Maxine S Jochelson; Panagiotis Kapetas; Pascal A T Baltzer; Alexander Haug; Marcus Hacker; Yasemin Tanyildizi; Elizabeth A Morris; Katja Pinker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Association Between Lifestyle Changes, Mammographic Breast Density, and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sara P Lester; Aparna S Kaur; Suneela Vegunta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Lesion Kinetics in Breast MRI of BRCA 1/2 Mutation Carriers Compared to Matched Controls Using Quantitative Kinetic Analysis.

Authors:  Alana A Lewin; Sungheon Gene Kim; James S Babb; Amy N Melsaether; Jason McKellop; Melanie Moccaldi; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Federico D Pineda; Milica Medved; Shiyang Wang; Xiaobing Fan; David V Schacht; Charlene Sennett; Aytekin Oto; Gillian M Newstead; Hiroyuki Abe; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Influence of Menstrual Cycle Timing on Screening Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Diagnostic Performance in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Brian N Dontchos; Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge; Constance D Lehman; Wendy B DeMartini
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2019-06-11

9.  Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI predicts response to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: preliminary evaluation in a cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Shandong Wu; Susan P Weinstein; Michael J DeLeo; Emily F Conant; Jinbo Chen; Susan M Domchek; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Prediction of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI using mammography, ultrasonography, and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Akiko Kawamura; Hiroko Satake; Satoko Ishigaki; Mitsuru Ikeda; Reiko Kimura; Kazuhiro Shimamoto; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.131

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.