Literature DB >> 25060941

A data-driven approach to prostate cancer detection from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Nandinee Fariah Haq1, Piotr Kozlowski1, Edward C Jones1, Silvia D Chang1, S Larry Goldenberg1, Mehdi Moradi2.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, has shown great potential in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging. In the current practice of DCE-MRI, diagnosis is based on quantitative parameters extracted from the series of T1-weighted images acquired after the injection of a contrast agent. To calculate these parameters, a pharmacokinetic model is fitted to the T1-weighted intensities. Most models make simplistic assumptions about the perfusion process. Moreover, these models require accurate estimation of the arterial input function, which is challenging. In this work we propose a data-driven approach to characterization of the prostate tissue that uses the time series of DCE T1-weighted images without pharmacokinetic modeling. This approach uses a number of model-free empirical parameters and also the principal component analysis (PCA) of the normalized T1-weighted intensities, as features for cancer detection from DCE MRI. The optimal set of principal components is extracted with sparse regularized regression through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A support vector machine classifier was used with leave-one-patient-out cross validation to determine the ability of this set of features in cancer detection. Our data is obtained from patients prior to radical prostatectomy and the results are validated based on histological evaluation of the extracted specimens. Our results, obtained on 449 tissue regions from 16 patients, show that the proposed data-driven features outperform the traditional pharmacokinetic parameters with an area under ROC of 0.86 for LASSO-isolated PCA parameters, compared to 0.78 for pharmacokinetic parameters. This shows that our novel approach to the analysis of DCE data has the potential to improve the multiparametric MRI protocol for prostate cancer detection.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; LASSO; PCA; Prostate cancer; SVM

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060941      PMCID: PMC5468093          DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  34 in total

1.  Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; Ran Meng; Burkhard Mädler; Robert Bell; Edward C Jones; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies.

Authors:  Caleb Roberts; Basma Issa; Andrew Stone; Alan Jackson; John C Waterton; Geoffrey J M Parker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics.

Authors:  G J Parker; J Suckling; S F Tanner; A R Padhani; P B Revell; J E Husband; M O Leach
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  P Y Poon; R W McCallum; M M Henkelman; M J Bronskill; S B Sutcliffe; M A Jewett; W D Rider; A W Bruce
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Computerized whole slide quantification shows increased microvascular density in pT2 prostate cancer as compared to normal prostate tissue.

Authors:  Cornelis G van Niekerk; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; M Elisa Börger; Henk-Jan Huisman; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables.

Authors:  H Augustin; G A Fritz; T Ehammer; M Auprich; K Pummer
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 8.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Robert V Mulkern; Lawrence P Panych; Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model.

Authors:  P S Tofts; B Berkowitz; M D Schnall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitative effects of acquisition duration and temporal resolution on the measurement accuracy of prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data: a phantom study.

Authors:  Silvin Paul Knight; Jacinta Elizabeth Browne; James Frances Mary Meaney; Andrew John Fagan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Evaluation of Golden-Angle-Sampled Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Reconstruction Using Objective Image Quality Measures: A Simulated Phantom Study.

Authors:  Nathan Murtha; Allister Mason; Chris Bowen; Sharon Clarke; James Rioux; Steven Beyea
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-12

3.  Identification of Potential MR-Derived Biomarkers for Tumor Tissue Response to 177Lu-Octreotate Therapy in an Animal Model of Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Tumor.

Authors:  Mikael Montelius; Johan Spetz; Oscar Jalnefjord; Evelin Berger; Ola Nilsson; Maria Ljungberg; Eva Forssell-Aronsson
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Head and Neck Cancer Tumor Segmentation Using Support Vector Machine in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Wei Deng; Liangping Luo; Xiaoyi Lin; Tianqi Fang; Dexiang Liu; Guo Dan; Hanwei Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.161

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.