PURPOSE: In this study, the authors investigated the feasibility of a dual resolution volume-of-interest (VOI) cone beam breast CT technique and compared two implementation approaches in terms of dose saving and scatter reduction. METHODS: With this technique, a lead VOI mask with an opening is inserted between the x-ray source and the breast to deliver x-ray exposure to the VOI while blocking x rays outside the VOI. A CCD detector is used to collect the high resolution projection data of the VOI. Low resolution cone beam CT (CBCT) images of the entire breast, acquired with a flat panel (FP) detector, were used to calculate the projection data outside the VOI with the ray-tracing reprojection method. The Feldkamp-Davis-Kress filtered backprojection algorithm was used to reconstruct the dual resolution 3D images. Breast phantoms with 180 microm and smaller microcalcifications (MCs) were imaged with both FP and FP-CCD dual resolution CBCT systems, respectively. Two approaches of implementing the dual resolution technique, breast-centered approach and VOI-centered approach, were investigated and evaluated for dose saving and scatter reduction with Monte Carlo simulation using a GEANT4 package. RESULTS: The results showed that the breast-centered approach saved more breast absorbed dose than did VOI-centered approach with similar scatter reduction. The MCs in fatty breast phantom, which were invisible with FP CBCT scan, became visible with the FP-CCD dual resolution CBCT scan. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate potential improvement of the image quality inside the VOI with reduced breast dose both inside and outside the VOI.
PURPOSE: In this study, the authors investigated the feasibility of a dual resolution volume-of-interest (VOI) cone beam breast CT technique and compared two implementation approaches in terms of dose saving and scatter reduction. METHODS: With this technique, a lead VOI mask with an opening is inserted between the x-ray source and the breast to deliver x-ray exposure to the VOI while blocking x rays outside the VOI. A CCD detector is used to collect the high resolution projection data of the VOI. Low resolution cone beam CT (CBCT) images of the entire breast, acquired with a flat panel (FP) detector, were used to calculate the projection data outside the VOI with the ray-tracing reprojection method. The Feldkamp-Davis-Kress filtered backprojection algorithm was used to reconstruct the dual resolution 3D images. Breast phantoms with 180 microm and smaller microcalcifications (MCs) were imaged with both FP and FP-CCD dual resolution CBCT systems, respectively. Two approaches of implementing the dual resolution technique, breast-centered approach and VOI-centered approach, were investigated and evaluated for dose saving and scatter reduction with Monte Carlo simulation using a GEANT4 package. RESULTS: The results showed that the breast-centered approach saved more breast absorbed dose than did VOI-centered approach with similar scatter reduction. The MCs in fatty breast phantom, which were invisible with FP CBCT scan, became visible with the FP-CCD dual resolution CBCT scan. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate potential improvement of the image quality inside the VOI with reduced breast dose both inside and outside the VOI.
Authors: S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi Journal: Med Phys Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Chao-Jen Lai; Chris C Shaw; Lingyun Chen; Mustafa C Altunbas; Xinming Liu; Tao Han; Tianpeng Wang; Wei T Yang; Gary J Whitman; Shu-Ju Tu Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Lingyun Chen; Chris C Shaw; Mustafa C Altunbas; Chao-Jen Lai; Xinming Liu; Tao Han; Tianpeng Wang; Wei T Yang; Gary J Whitman Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: A Sisniega; W Zbijewski; J W Stayman; J Xu; K Taguchi; E Fredenberg; Mats Lundqvist; J H Siewerdsen Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Marcus Zuber; Michael Laaß; Elias Hamann; Sophie Kretschmer; Norbert Hauschke; Thomas van de Kamp; Tilo Baumbach; Thomas Koenig Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mengzhou Li; Zheng Fang; Wenxiang Cong; Chuang Niu; Weiwen Wu; Josef Uher; James Bennett; Jay T Rubinstein; G E Wang Journal: IEEE Access Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 3.367