Literature DB >> 17822008

Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.

Chao-Jen Lai1, Chris C Shaw, Lingyun Chen, Mustafa C Altunbas, Xinming Liu, Tao Han, Tianpeng Wang, Wei T Yang, Gary J Whitman, Shu-Ju Tu.   

Abstract

Mammography is the only technique currently used for detecting microcalcification (MC) clusters, an early indicator of breast cancer. However, mammographic images superimpose a three-dimensional compressed breast image onto two-dimensional projection views, resulting in overlapped anatomical breast structures that may obscure the detection and visualization of MCs. One possible solution to this problem is the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with a flat-panel (FP) digital detector. Although feasibility studies of CBCT techniques for breast imaging have yielded promising results, they have not shown how radiation dose and x-ray tube voltage affect the accuracy with which MCs are detected by CBCT experimentally. We therefore conducted a phantom study using a FP-based CBCT system with various mean glandular doses and kVp values. An experimental CBCT scanner was constructed with a data acquisition rate of 7.5 frames/s. 10.5 and 14.5 cm diameter breast phantoms made of gelatin were used to simulate uncompressed breasts consisting of 100% glandular tissue. Eight different MC sizes of calcium carbonate grains, ranging from 180-200 microm to 355-425 microm, were used to simulate MCs. MCs of the same size were arranged to form a 5 x 5 MC cluster and embedded in the breast phantoms. These MC clusters were positioned at 2.8 cm away from the center of the breast phantoms. The phantoms were imaged at 60, 80, and 100 kVp. With a single scan (360 degrees), 300 projection images were acquired with 0.5 x, 1x, and 2x mean glandular dose limit for 10.5 cm phantom and with 1x, 2x, and 4x for 14.5 cm phantom. A Feldkamp algorithm with a pure ramp filter was used for image reconstruction. The normalized noise level was calculated for each x-ray tube voltage and dose level. The image quality of the CBCT images was evaluated by counting the number of visible MCs for each MC cluster for various conditions. The average percentage of the visible MCs was computed and plotted as a function of the MGD, the kVp, and the average MC size. The results showed that the MC visibility increased with the MGD significantly but decreased with the breast size. The results also showed that the x-ray tube voltage affects the detection of MCs under different circumstances. With a 50% threshold, the minimum detectable MC sizes for the 10.5 cm phantom were 348(+/-2), 288(+/-7), 257(+/-2) microm at 3, 6, and 12 mGy, respectively. Those for the 14.5 cm phantom were 355 (+/-1), 307 (+/-7), 275 (+/-5) microm at 6, 12, and 24 mGy, respectively. With a 75% threshold, the minimum detectable MC sizes for the 10.5 cm phantom were 367 (+/-1), 316 (+/-7), 265 (+/-3) microm at 3, 6, and 12 mGy, respectively. Those for the 14.5 cm phantom were 377 (+/-3), 334 (+/-5), 300 (+/-2) microm at 6, 12, and 24 mGy, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822008      PMCID: PMC2867610          DOI: 10.1118/1.2745921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; D Albagli; S Han; E J Tkaczyk; C E Landberg; B Opsahl-Ong; P R Granfors; I Levis; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Nelson; K K Lindfors; J A Seibert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  The physics of computed radiography.

Authors:  J A Rowlands
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).

Authors:  Xiujiang J Rong; Chris C Shaw; Dennis A Johnston; Michael R Lemacks; Xinming Liu; Gary J Whitman; Mark J Dryden; Tanya W Stephens; Stephen K Thompson; Kerry T Krugh; Chao-Jen Lai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.

Authors:  Xing Gong; Aruna A Vedula; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone; N Shah; T R Nelson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.

Authors:  Biao Chen; Ruola Ning
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  The false-negative mammogram.

Authors:  P T Huynh; A M Jarolimek; S Daye
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Lawrence J Moss; Pamela K Isaacs; Andrew Karellas; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  34 in total

1.  High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.

Authors:  Youtao Shen; Ying Yi; Yuncheng Zhong; Chao-Jen Lai; Xinming Liu; Zhicheng You; Shuaiping Ge; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Investigation of x-ray spectra for iodinated contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick; Andrey Makeev
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-26

3.  Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: feasibility study with surgical mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  Wei Tse Yang; Selin Carkaci; Lingyun Chen; Chao-Jen Lai; Aysegul Sahin; Gary J Whitman; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Noise power properties of a cone-beam CT system for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; Shih-Ying Huang; Nathan J Packard; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Youtao Shen; Yuncheng Zhong; Chao-Jen Lai; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Penalized-Likelihood Reconstruction With High-Fidelity Measurement Models for High-Resolution Cone-Beam Imaging.

Authors:  Steven Tilley; Matthew Jacobson; Qian Cao; Michael Brehler; Alejandro Sisniega; Wojciech Zbijewski; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 7.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Feasibility of volume-of-interest (VOI) scanning technique in cone beam breast CT--a preliminary study.

Authors:  Lingyun Chen; Chris C Shaw; Mustafa C Altunbas; Chao-Jen Lai; Xinming Liu; Tao Han; Tianpeng Wang; Wei T Yang; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dual resolution cone beam breast CT: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Lingyun Chen; Youtao Shen; Chao-Jen Lai; Tao Han; Yuncheng Zhong; Shuaiping Ge; Xinming Liu; Tianpeng Wang; Wei T Yang; Gary J Whitman; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.