Literature DB >> 26611740

Volumetric CT with sparse detector arrays (and application to Si-strip photon counters).

A Sisniega1, W Zbijewski, J W Stayman, J Xu, K Taguchi, E Fredenberg, Mats Lundqvist, J H Siewerdsen.   

Abstract

Novel x-ray medical imaging sensors, such as photon counting detectors (PCDs) and large area CCD and CMOS cameras can involve irregular and/or sparse sampling of the detector plane. Application of such detectors to CT involves undersampling that is markedly different from the commonly considered case of sparse angular sampling. This work investigates volumetric sampling in CT systems incorporating sparsely sampled detectors with axial and helical scan orbits and evaluates performance of model-based image reconstruction (MBIR) with spatially varying regularization in mitigating artifacts due to sparse detector sampling. Volumetric metrics of sampling density and uniformity were introduced. Penalized-likelihood MBIR with a spatially varying penalty that homogenized resolution by accounting for variations in local sampling density (i.e. detector gaps) was evaluated. The proposed methodology was tested in simulations and on an imaging bench based on a Si-strip PCD (total area 5 cm  ×  25 cm) consisting of an arrangement of line sensors separated by gaps of up to 2.5 mm. The bench was equipped with translation/rotation stages allowing a variety of scanning trajectories, ranging from a simple axial acquisition to helical scans with variable pitch. Statistical (spherical clutter) and anthropomorphic (hand) phantoms were considered. Image quality was compared to that obtained with a conventional uniform penalty in terms of structural similarity index (SSIM), image uniformity, spatial resolution, contrast, and noise. Scan trajectories with intermediate helical width (~10 mm longitudinal distance per 360° rotation) demonstrated optimal tradeoff between the average sampling density and the homogeneity of sampling throughout the volume. For a scan trajectory with 10.8 mm helical width, the spatially varying penalty resulted in significant visual reduction of sampling artifacts, confirmed by a 10% reduction in minimum SSIM (from 0.88 to 0.8) and a 40% reduction in the dispersion of SSIM in the volume compared to the constant penalty (both penalties applied at optimal regularization strength). Images of the spherical clutter and wrist phantoms confirmed the advantages of the spatially varying penalty, showing a 25% improvement in image uniformity and 1.8  ×  higher CNR (at matched spatial resolution) compared to the constant penalty. The studies elucidate the relationship between sampling in the detector plane, acquisition orbit, sampling of the reconstructed volume, and the resulting image quality. They also demonstrate the benefit of spatially varying regularization in MBIR for scenarios with irregular sampling patterns. Such findings are important and integral to the incorporation of a sparsely sampled Si-strip PCD in CT imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26611740      PMCID: PMC5070652          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  60 in total

1.  Strategy of computed tomography sinogram inpainting based on sinusoid-like curve decomposition and eigenvector-guided interpolation.

Authors:  Yinsheng Li; Yang Chen; Yining Hu; Ahmed Oukili; Limin Luo; Wufan Chen; Christine Toumoulin
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Temporal resolution improvement in cardiac CT using PICCS (TRI-PICCS): performance studies.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Jiang Hsieh; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A new data consistency condition for fan-beam projection data.

Authors:  Guang-Hong Chen; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Assessment of three dead detector correction methods for cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  David W Nelms; Hemant I Shukla; Earl Nixon; John E Bayouth; Ryan T Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Photon counting spectral breast CT: effect of adaptive filtration on CT numbers, noise, and contrast to noise ratio.

Authors:  Justin D Silkwood; Kenneth L Matthews; Polad M Shikhaliev
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  3D forward and back-projection for X-ray CT using separable footprints.

Authors:  Yong Long; Jeffrey A Fessler; James M Balter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose?

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; Shoma Berkemeyer; Ralf Girnus; Alexander Sommer; Horst Lenzen; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography.

Authors:  H Erdogan; J A Fessler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging.

Authors:  Florian F Schmitzberger; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Rüdiger Lawaczeck; Magnus Hemmendorff; Elin Moa; Mats Danielsson; Ulrich Bick; Susanne Diekmann; Alexander Pöllinger; Florian J Engelken; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  How little data is enough? Phase-diagram analysis of sparsity-regularized X-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  J S Jørgensen; E Y Sidky
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels.

Authors:  Raoul M S Joemai; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.